tubol mo pilipino ako hhahah hahah
Answer:
When they gained democracy, they treated their economic issues more than discussions of how to strengthen and consolidate democracy and human development.
The weapons from those wars have remained in the hands of soldiers and rebels or have been sold on the street which has contributed to atrocious levels of violent crime.
The recognition of human rights is gradually becoming more practicable and some of the more heinous crimes of our the past are being brought to justice
Yes I Believe He was a strong supporter of the Roman Church
Answer:
explained
Explanation:
I think the abolition approach was the best because of the moral position of its argument against slavery. It was mostly peaceful, showing that blacks are not animals, and should not be treated like property, or inferior at all. Abolitionists exposed the immorality of slavery and how blacks are just as human and deserve the same rights and respect as whites do. Colonization was a horrible idea, and it dehumanized blacks. And slave rebellions were powerful way to show resistance and strength, but weren't as effective and didn't seem to work for many slaves died. Abolitionists saw peaceful resistance and powerful words more effective, and they were very influential in the actual abolition of slavery in the U.S. It helped using religious arguments against slavery, calling it a sin; I think this helped whites in America to understand and realize the reality of the slavery and how immoral it was.
Rivers, and flat plains.
Rivers proved pivotal for settlements to grow since it provides a means of water for growing crops, a means of produce which people can consume. Rivers also are a means of transportation and a geographic barrier against attack, albeit slight.
Flat plains also proved viable for settlements because of how easy they were to traverse, coupled with it being easier to farm on said land.
