An argument is invalid if and only if all the premises is true and the conclusion is false.
We can test the invalidity of the argument by assuming all the premises are true and seeing whether it is possible for the conclusion to be false. If the conclusion is possible to be false, then, the argument is invalid.
A valid argument, on the other hand, is valid if and only if it is necessary that:
1) if all of the premises are true, then the conclusion is true
2) if all of the premises are true, then the conclusion must be true
3) it is impossible that all the premises are true and the conclusion is false.
Answer:
Electronic cigarettes should not be banned because it can help cigarette smokers come off a bad habit. Even though there aren't sufficient studies out on e-cigarettes, there has been a lot of positive outcome on regular cigarette smokes being able to kick their addiction.
(use QuiliBot to change the words for you (: )
I hope this helps!
In this excerpt Marcus faces the conflict that his father doesn't agree with him. This type of conflict is called "Man vs. Man" It is the most common type of conflict in a piece of literature, it is also known as interpersonal conflict. In a man vs. man conflict, the protagonist, Marcus, feels something different than another character or the antagonist. This is the type of conflict that Marcus faces.
Hope this helps! :)
The answer is "He is uneducated".
13 reasons why, it has book series too
