1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
fgiga [73]
3 years ago
8

What character trait of the speaker is evident in lines 13-14: "the woods are lovely, dark and deep, / but I have promises to ke

ep"? The speaker is : lazy, reckless, lost, responsible, careful
English
2 answers:
KonstantinChe [14]3 years ago
6 0
Responsible

Because he knows he has to do what he promised to do.

Hope this helps!
Shalnov [3]3 years ago
4 0
Lost. Because he finds that the woods are "dark" and "deep" lovely. Also he is questioning himself. His desire to enter the dark abyss of the woods is in direct opposition to the promises he needs to keep. He is not even sure if he even has promises that are needed to be kept, hence the ending question.

Just an option. ‍♂️
You might be interested in
Create a parenthetical citation for the following information. Be careful! Remember, your spacing and punctuation must be exact.
tangare [24]
<span>The African American and the Settling of the West, Sarah Nichols and Marie Hernandez, ed.Aaron Wilds.</span>
6 0
3 years ago
Which of the following best describes the theme of this excerpt in Liberalism and Socialism
Artist 52 [7]

Answer:

Socialists, who are they? and liberalism, what is it? I shall choose here to signify as socialist those thinkers and spokesmen who cannot be faulted as tender toward authoritarian regimes: I shall exclude Communists, Maoists, Castroites, as well as their hybrids, cousins, and reticent wooers. I shall assume that with regard to liberalism there has been some coherence of outlook among the various shades of socialist (and Marxist) opinion. But in talking about liberalism I shall be readier to acknowledge the complexities and confusions of historical actuality. And this for two reasons: first, that liberalism is our main interest today; and second, that since a surplus of variables can paralyze analysis (eight kinds of socialism matched against six of liberalism yield how many combinations/ confrontations?), I would justify taking one’s sights from a more-or-less fixed position as a way of grasping a range of shifting phenomena.

In the socialist literature, though not there alone, liberalism has taken on at least the following roles and meanings:

Especially in Europe, liberalism has signifed those movements and currents of opinion that arose toward the end of the 18th century, seeking to loosen the constraints traditional societies had imposed on the commercial classes and proposing modes of government in which the political and economic behavior of individuals would be subjected to a minimum of regulation. Social life came to be seen as a field in which an equilibrium of desired goods could be realized if individuals were left free to pursue their interests.1 This, roughly, is what liberalism has signified in Marxist literature, starting with Marx’s articles for the Rheinische Zeitung and extending through the polemics of Kautsky, Bernstein, and Luxemburg. In short: “classical” liberalism.

Both in Europe and America, liberalism has also been seen as a system of beliefs stressing such political freedoms as those specified in the U.S. Bill of Rights. Rising from the lowlands of interest to the highlands of value, this view of liberalism proposes a commitment to “formal” freedoms—speech, assembly, press, etc.—so that in principle, as sometimes in practice, liberalism need have no necessary connection with, or dependence upon, any particular way of organizing the economy.

Especially in 20th-century America but also in Europe, liberalism has come to signify movements of social reform seeking to “humanize” industrial-capitalist society, usually on the premise that this could be done sufficiently or satisfactorily without having to resort to radical/ socialist measures—in current shorthand: the welfare state. At its best, this social liberalism has also viewed itself as strictly committed to the political liberalism of #2 above.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
HELP!!!!!!!!!!
rusak2 [61]

Answer:

The answer is C

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which One is NOT.....
konstantin123 [22]
The 1st one, because what does girls, and moms have to do with anything.
7 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Roosevelt uses the three lists bolded in the excerpt to explain his views. Which of the following best describes the information
Masteriza [31]

Answer: This is the excerpt.

Question

Franklin Roosevelt's "State of the Union Address, 1941," excerpt

Equality of opportunity for youth and for others.

Jobs for those who can work.

Security for those who need it.

The ending of special privilege for the few

The preservation of civil liberties for all.

The enjoyment of the fruits of scientific progress in a wider and constantly rising standard of living.

We should bring more citizens under the coverage of old-age pensions and unemployment insurance.

We should widen the opportunities for adequate medical care.

We should plan a better system by which persons deserving or needing gainful employment may

obtain it.

The first is freedom of speech and expression—everywhere in the world.

The second is freedom of every person to worship God in his own way—everywhere in the world.

The third is freedom from want—which, translated into world terms, means economic understandings

which will secure to every nation a healthy peacetime life for its inhabitants—everywhere in the world.

The fourth is freedom from fear—which, translated into world terms, means a world-wide reduction of

armaments to such a point and in such a thorough fashion that no nation will be in a position to

commit an act of physical aggression against any neighbor—anywhere in the world.

The correct option is D.

The information is practical and idealistic.

Explanation:

Roosevelt uses the three listed bolded in the excerpts to explain his views.

The information is practical and idealistic. This is because from the excerpts, it can be practiced. From the information, what is said is praticeable and achievable. It is what that can be done or is easily done to achieve the intended goal. From the Roosevelt views, the information given is something that can be done or practice and idealistic , believing this can be achieved even when it's seems unachievable.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • what does it mean when a little star is put next to a proofread essay? I need to rewrite my essay from my teacher’s corrections
    13·1 answer
  • The skeleton of a vertebrate is
    10·1 answer
  • What do you call the belief that the natural world is filled with spirits?
    14·1 answer
  • Please help ASAP, I'll mark brainliest.
    13·1 answer
  • In writing an argumentative research paper about the unfairness of a military
    8·1 answer
  • A written story about an alien invasion is adapted to be told as if it were
    11·2 answers
  • Falter(verb) in a short sentence
    14·1 answer
  • Using diction, create a scary scene (4-5 sentences)
    12·1 answer
  • 7. Simplify the following:<br>4<br>(i)<br>TIN<br>مسار<br>+<br>9​
    7·1 answer
  • What does Dickon do to signal to Mary that he will return and help with<br> the garden?
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!