I wouldn't say that the Capulets (or the Montagues, for that matter) are complex characters. They are there merely to advance the plot of the play, and to cause the tragic events which occur in the end. We don't really know much about either of the families, except for the fact that they have always had a particular feud and are therefore sworn enemies. They do act as a villain in the play, given that it is basically because of them that their children die because they weren't allowed to love each other.
assuming that this is the sentence you're referring to :
Sentence 1: As I turned onto Bryce Road, I saw the Parkers’ cat crouched under a tree, hissing at something on the ground.
Sentence 2: I decided to ride my skateboard to school this morning.
Sentence 3: I shooed the cat away and called my older stepbrother, a veterinarian, because he would know just how to help them.
Sentence 4: Approaching the cat, I noticed that a nest full of tiny birds was on the ground; it must have fallen from a branch.
The most logical way to sequence these into logical narratives would be :
Sentence 2 , Sentence 1, Sentence 4, sentence 3
Sartre uses some obscure expressions. write brief explanations of the following: ""existence precedes essence;"" ""anguish""; ""bad faith."
The above lines are taken from article - A student’s guide to Jean-Paul Sartre’s Existentialism and Humanism
Nigel Warburton offers a short advent to this classic text.
Existentialism and Humanism might be the maximum extensively read of all Sartre’s philosophical writings, and it is clearly certainly one of his extra reachable portions; but fairly little has been written approximately it. One cause of this may be that Sartre himself came to regret the e-book of the e-book and later repudiated parts of it. however Existentialism and Humanism provides a very good advent to a number of key issues in his foremost paintings of the identical length, Being and Nothingness, and to some of the essential questions about human life which can be the starting point for the majority’s hobby in philosophy at all.
It's far common practice for instructors inside the Anglo-American philosophical lifestyle to be scathing approximately Sartre’s philosophy, dismissing it as woolly, jargon-laden, derivative, wrong-headed and so on – in Bryan Magee’s current television collection ‘The outstanding Philosophers’, for example, Sartre’s philosophy become declared to be handiest of passing interest. however even wherein Sartre’s philosophy is manifestly mistaken, because it actually is in Existentialism and Humanism, it could fireplace the imagination and provide actual perception into the human condition.
Learn more about Sartre’s brainly.com/question/27973269
#SPJ4
