flavored nachos, so as to deliver it with proper mentioned reason.Hence,
Hence, This study is not well designed because formulas A and B are not compared with the original formula.
Step-by-step explanation:
As mentioned above, the cmpany needs to check the new upcoming flavors of nachos i.e., A and B and is said that it should meeet the requirement of getting better from their regular ones as well. For this, the company must release the two new nachos flavors A and B, irrespective of quantity and let the customers compare it with along the regular nachos.This demands for a fact that the 50 nachos been tasted should be compared with the regular flavored nachos so as to meet the demand getting better than the usual ones. For this to happen,the above mentioned study describes it the best.
This is the correct explanation for the above question
Answer:
-5
----
6
Step-by-step explanation:
y2-y1
-------
x2-x1
-1-4 -5
------ = ---
4--2 6
~Anna
Each slice would cost 0.40¢.
This is because 2.40/6=.40
Answer:
y=2x-13
Step-by-step explanation:
m=(y2-y1)/(x2-x1)
m=(-7-(-1))/(3-6)
m=(-7+1)/-3
m=-6/-3
m=2
y-y1=m(x-x1)
y-(-1)=2(x-6)
y+1=2(x-6)
y=2x-12-1
y=2x-13
9514 1404 393
Answer:
D.
Step-by-step explanation:
The wording "when x is an appropriate value" is irrelevant to this question. That phrase should be ignored. (You may want to report this to your teacher.)
When you look at the answer choices, you see that all of them are negative except the last one (D). When you look at the problem fraction, you see that it is positive.
The only reasonable choice is D.
__
Your calculator can check this for you.
√12/(√3 +3) ≈ 3.4641/(1.7321 +3)
= 3.4641/4.7321 ≈ 0.7321 = -1 +√3
__
If you want to "rationalize the denominator", then multiply numerator and denominator by the conjugate of the denominator. The conjugate is formed by switching the sign between terms.

_____
<em>Additional comment</em>
We "rationalize the denominator" in this way to take advantage of the relation ...
(a -b)(a +b) = a² -b²
Using this gets rid of the irrational root in the denominator, hence "rationalizes" the denominator.
We could also have multiplied by (3 -√3)/(3 -√3). This would have made the denominator positive, instead of negative. However, I chose to use (√3 -3) so you could see that all we did was change the sign from (√3 +3).