1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Amanda [17]
2 years ago
13

Who should have more power: a king Or the law-making branch of a government? Why?

History
1 answer:
Dominik [7]2 years ago
6 0

Answer:

A law -making branch of government.

Explanation:

Because they make law and therefore have more responsibility on what happens to our planet or U.S and in what can or cannot happen while the only places that have kings are the U.K, Zealand, Austria.

You might be interested in
What results from the federal system of government in the United States? A. State governments have some powers that the federal
Andre45 [30]

The federal government is composed of three distinct branches: legislative, executive, and judicial, whose powers are vested by the U.S. Constitution in the Congress, the president, and the federal courts, respectively.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following are purposes of the United Nations according to the Charter Preamble?
____ [38]
Maintaining peace throughout the world and promoting human rights and freedom are the two purposes of the United Nations among the following, according to the Charter Preamble. The correct options among the all the options that are given are the second and the third option. I hope the answer comes to your help.
4 0
2 years ago
Which statement about the executive roles of the president of the United States and the queen of England is true?
Ugo [173]

A. The president fills the roles of head of state and head of government.

The Queen's role in politics is very small, as Britain has turned into a representative democracy.

6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which statements describe Spanish explorers’ interactions with American Indians in the 1500s? Check all that apply.
castortr0y [4]

Answer:

Conflict between the European and American indians was common.

Explanation:

Europeans constantly tried to convert the Indians, take their land, and all in all never respected them. Therefore arguments were common.

8 0
2 years ago
3. Explain how World War II changed opportunities for the following three
olchik [2.2K]

Explanation:

African Americans came back as liberators

Women worked when the men fought

Japanese Americans were sent to internment camps, wrongfully suspected as potential traitors

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What two new parties filled the gap left by the death of the Whigs in the 1850s?
    15·1 answer
  • Do you believe the Nicaraguan revolution was successful ? Why or why not ?? (Please answer fast )
    13·1 answer
  • Did Greek become the basis of Romance languages like Spanish and french
    9·2 answers
  • Read the excerpt from Robert Kennedy's speech
    14·1 answer
  • What is a major goal of the juvenile justice system?
    11·2 answers
  • How can you determine the meaning of a word?
    10·1 answer
  • What are the last two territories to become US states ​
    13·1 answer
  • 7. After Vice-President, what are the next five spaces of presidential succession
    7·1 answer
  • Was the new deal an effective answer to the Great Depression
    15·1 answer
  • At Fort Union, what medicine was thought to be the best medicine for children?
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!