1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
wlad13 [49]
3 years ago
8

How did doves in congress officially call into question the u.s. presence in vietnam?

History
2 answers:
frosja888 [35]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

in 1967 and 1968 senator William Fulbright held hearings for war

slega [8]3 years ago
6 0
The appropriate response is in 1967 and 1968 Senator William Fulbright held open hearings on the war. The Fulbright Hearings alludes to any of the arrangement of U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearings on Vietnam led in the vicinity of 1966 and 1971. This article concerns those held by the U.S. Senate in 1971 identifying with the Vietnam War.
You might be interested in
Which statement describes a major advantage of a confederal system of government over a unitary system
Firdavs [7]
The major advantage is that the states have their own right to choose which laws will apply to them and in what way, based on their own interpretation of the laws.
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What reasons does eisenhower give for gathering information about the soviet military?
Ivanshal [37]
Lpl                               .............................................................................................
                                                                    
6 0
3 years ago
How many years did george washington serve in the military?
neonofarm [45]

Answer:

George Washington (1732-99) was commander in chief of the Continental Army during the American Revolutionary War (1775-83) and served two terms as the first U.S. president, from 1789 to 1797.

Hope this helps! (:<3

3 0
3 years ago
NEED TO BE ANSWERED ASAP!!! WILL MARK AS BRAINLIEST IF IT IS ANSWERED CORRECTLY
ale4655 [162]

Answer:

    The bombing of Hiroshima is and Nagaski is one of the most important events in history. Due to the fact that this affected and still is affecting human kind in Hiroshima and Nagaski. This all occurred because of Hiroshimas military and to the intend to make Japan surrender, in cause to end World War ll, they later decided to bomb Nagaski too. Over 200,000 died and thousands more were hurt in this tragity, but some surviors live to tell the story of this historic moment. Two of those surviors were Sunao Tsuboi and Shigemitsu Tanaka,  victims of the Hiroshima and Nagaski bombing on August 6, 1945 and August 9, of 1945.

   While Sunao Tsuboi was a 20 year old man heading to collage in Hiroshima  when this occurred, he was buned from head to toe he stated in NYTimes.com. He knew at this moment it would be the end for him, he layed next to a bridge. Until a classmate found and  approched him, he took him to a military hsopital where he got medical help. Till this day he is a retired worker, with a wife, children, and grandchildern. He has worked in office for the President and urged and stated this to the president to "work for world peace after he leave office".

  Shigemitsu Tanaka, was almost five when he witness this tragity. He discribed everything as white, windows braking, and a huge thunderclap in the sky. He was only playing under a tree when he took cover and tried to protect  himself. Later his mother suffered from repeated illnesses she worked as an elementary instructor. His father later died from cancer after 12 years of the bombing. Tanka said he "smelled burning flesh and moans", he also stated that Obama should clear nuclear wepons for good and hoped he would sit and listen to survivors.

   I would not defend nor support this tragity due to the fact that many innocent people were hurt or killed. In my opionion I think the United States should have used a diffrerent strategy to the point where no human being should have been hurt. Sometimes I do not understand why the United States didn't take percuation in this situation for the people. They always use the moto "For the good of the people" but did not lead up to this at the end. So in conculsion I DO NOT support or defend the bombing of Hiroshima or Nagaski.  

WRBSITES:https://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/28/world/asia/survivors-recount-horrors-of-hiroshima-and-nagasaki.html

Hope this somewhat helps you out, make sure to check for spelling errors many typos.

websites: https://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/28/world/asia/survivors-recount-horrors-of-hiroshima-and-nagasaki.htmlExplanation:

6 0
3 years ago
How did the Euphrates River contribute to the development and splendor of Babylon?
wariber [46]

Answer: the answer you are looking for is c.The gold and silver it supplied financed the construction.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • The middle class that emerged during the industrial revolution consisted mainly of
    7·2 answers
  • Which event challenged the strength of the Articles of Confederation?
    11·2 answers
  • This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which s
    7·2 answers
  • The new system of production during the Second Industrial Revolution meant that unskilled workers did
    14·2 answers
  • Explain how culture influenced the Italian Renaissance?
    12·1 answer
  • Georgia was expected to participate in the system of mercantilism by
    10·1 answer
  • Did Hamilton's letter help or hurt Jefferson
    5·1 answer
  • What were some effects of the red scare
    13·1 answer
  • How did the rewards of athletic competition change over the years?
    8·1 answer
  • According to confucius, what is the "foundation, whence all other virtues spring?
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!