Answer: Settlers and tribes both had effects on each other. On many trails headed west, settlers traveled in fear of attack from tribes who would rob or kill members of caravans. Tribes would attack stagecoaches and wagons that traveled across their lands. On the other hand, settlers constantly encroached on tribes’ lands. When settlers drove cattle, built railroads, established trails, and created new settlements, tribes were driven off of their lands. Often, this happened to tribes that had already relocated from other parts of the country to escape settlement. As the two groups fought over land, tribes struggled to get the resources they needed. While both groups profited from each other, both also were harmed by expansion in different ways.
I am not totally sure about this one but I believe it would be p<span>rops used in the Renaissance period were much more elaborate than those used by the Greeks and Romans.
The renaissance was, in many ways, more advanced than Greece and Rome because </span>the Renaissance was more of a continuation of the discoveries and ways of life that had existed during the Greek and Roman times. As such, it would make sense that the Renaissance had more complex theatre props. Also theatre was flourishing during the Renaissance so better props would have been made.
They oppossed the national bank because they believed that it favored the wealthy
Sostre was believed to have been producing molotovs in his basement and organizing looting and arson and similar things so they arrested him. He was eventually moved to a different prison which enabled him to contact his lawyers more and the case developed and people started polarizing over the idea of whether he was a good guy or a bad guy.
