The Anti-Federalists feared that if the Constitution was ratified (became law) that it would give far too much power to the federal government over the states--leading to tyranny and the trampling of individual rights.
<span>The rules committee ultimately wields greater influence over the outcome of a bill than the bills sponsor. This is due to the fact that the rules committee has the final approval over proposed bills, making the sponsor subject to the ruling of the committee.</span>
Answer:
So the UN managed to assemble a combined military force of many different nations to hold back the North Korean army. This was possible because of the activity in the council by its member states, and because of the change of rhetoric since the beginning of the 20th century.
The League of Nations was formed as a predecessor to the UN and partly NATO, but it was wildly ineffective. None of the member states were willing to commit military forces to the council to enforce peace and it was all mostly influenced by the isolationism of the US and the appeasement and neutrality policy of the Allies. So basically the UN is a revamped version of the League of Nations because it is more effective and it is forcing member states to participate while the League of Nations did not manage to do that. And it is important to note that the North Korean crisis was stopped because of the military intervention of the UN. While the League of Nations would have done basically nothing if they still existed at that point.
<em><u>Answer:</u></em>
Point 1- Avoiding french future hostility encompassing it with more grounded nations (ie-Switzerland perceived as an autonomous country).
Point 2- Reestablish a parity of intensity so no nation danger to each other.
Point 3-Wanted to reestablish European imperial families to the honored positions they had held before Napoleon's victories.
<em><u>Explanation:</u></em>
After the Napoleonic Wars, focal Europe as often as possible saw essential discretionary exchanges, and urban communities, for example, Vienna, Aix-la-Chapelle, Carlsbad, Troppau, and Laibach filled in as the spots for meet of European rulers and negotiators. Austrian Chancellor Clemens Wenzel Lothar Nepomuk Prince von Metternich-Winneburg assumed a main job at these gatherings somewhere in the range of 1814 and 1822, and he especially needed them to occur in the regions of the Austrian Empire since he could in this manner better control their course and apply impact over the occasions to a degree without a doubt surpassing the genuine intensity of the express whose intrigues he upheld.