The answer for this problem would be B. Why? Well The government was not afraid of sending people to the moon because we were the first ones to go there. Second America CAN NOT just place a flag on the moon and call it americas territory, that’s not how it works. Third, NASA is funded by the government so therefore they did not run out of money because the only way they’d run out of money is if the government ran out. So therefore B is the most logical answer because it is A LOT cheaper to use satellites instead of rockets. Hope this helps!
The sound of similar sounding word usage can make the state of mind or tone of a ballad or bit of composition.For example Gentler sounds like "h" or "l" may make a more reflective or sentimental state of mind or tone. The monotonous sounds in similar sounding word usage work with different components like meter and word decision to make the coveted state of mind or tone.
Answer:
Part A: D as they were helpful and res[ectful
Explanation:
Part B: C as if you read the story it says she was very friendly and they caught that and it is the only one saying that she is friendly.
Answer:
D
Explanation:
He wanted to reach a wider audience by addressing the themes of oppression, suffering, and injustice without explicitly referring to current events.
Answer:
B). "He found that children and adults who have read stories their whole lives were more likely to correctly identify the feelings and thoughts of others than those who do not read regularly."
C). "Trying to understand these characters exercises the same mental muscle that helps us understand people in the real world."
Explanation:
The above two evidence factually support and substantiate the claim that 'people who read stories are better at communicating and understanding the feelings of others.'
The first evidence i.e. option B states that <u>the research revealed 'the children or adults who have been reading stories constantly their whole lives are able to recognize the thoughts or feelings of others more accurately' while the second evidence i.e. option C asserts logically that 'in attempt to understand the characters of stories, the same mental muscle is required for understanding people in real life.'</u>
Thus, these two pieces of evidence not only support but substantiates how reading comprehends our understanding of thoughts, opinions, or feelings of others. Hence, <u>options B and C</u> are the correct answers.
