1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Paraphin [41]
3 years ago
5

Which of the following was NOT a reason for United States expansion between 1880 and 1914?

History
2 answers:
kap26 [50]3 years ago
8 0

Answer: A

 The United States had strong influence of Christianity since the Pilgrims and many others who brought and taught about God and faith, also about the importance of missionary outreach. Nevertheless, unfortunately, the goal and interest for expanding, in this period, <em>was not</em> the desire to extend Christianity and a life of faith.

Novosadov [1.4K]3 years ago
5 0

Letter A is correct. Many are the reasons that led to the United States expansion, but the desire to extend Christianity was not one of them. The U.S expanded westward across North America, initially as part of 'Manifest Destiny', but also as an outlet for their growing population. They also wanted an overseas empire like the other major western powers at the time (such as Britain and France). And, that included new markets and sources of revenue along with a more proeminent position on the world stage.

You might be interested in
Hills rise to higher elevation than the land around them, and most. A.are very steep B. are not steep
nignag [31]
Most hills are "B. Not steep", since for it to be a hill it needs to be somewhere in between the elevation of flat land and mountainous land, which of course is much higher and usually steeper. 
3 0
3 years ago
100 POINTS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
harina [27]

Answer:

see below the con and pros

Explanation:

pros

in the modern-day city of Istanbul which was Constantinople, now its Istanbul, not Constantinople.  Which provided the inspiration for a song made famous by They Might Be Giants.

cons

the fall of Byzantine empire, the question of what life would be like, if it hadn’t, will never be answered.  Sure, there might be some alternate reality where the Byzantines are alive and well.  Aspects of string theory certainly suggest so.  But who knows what the modern political landscape might look like with the formal existence of the Byzantine?

pros

The fall of the Byzantine empire is part of the history of the world, as we know it.   We might wear hats on our feet for all we know.   What might the world look like if the empire had not fallen?

cons

Fall of the Byzantine empire led to an abundance of knowledge that is lost forever, think about that forever.  The loss of “Greek Fire” is definitely a drag.  Greek Fire was an incendiary weapon used by the Byzantine navy, and could burn on water. No one knows just what went into that technological advantage possessed by the Byzantines.  

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did the growth and development of railroads affect the American economy?
Sphinxa [80]
The best option will be the C. Railroads made the rapid movement of produce and goods into many markets possible.

Because Railroads basically were the key point to national business and economic growth. Eliminating the needs for long and weary trips, while also founding and fueling other soon-to-be huge business industries, such as iron, coal, copper, machinery, etc., railroads made "rapid movement of produce and goods into many markets possible."
5 0
3 years ago
All of the following generally describe the Southern states during the mid 1800s EXCEPT:
Ksivusya [100]
The answer is A. They didn’t want tariffs, did need slaves and used slaves in farms
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In what way did the Treaty of Versailles (which ended WW1) help lead to WW2?
natima [27]
The Treaty of Versailles was very harsh on Germany and promoted the rise of Nazism which was very aggresive and put other nations in threat.

The Treaty of Versailles demanded Germany to accept the war guilt clause, and the civilians were discontent about the government accepting the great humiliation towards Germany. They desired a stronger government that can return their national sovereignty and bring them national glory. This gave rise to Hitler who promised to bring national glory to Germany.

The Treaty also demanded a compensation of 6.6 Billion,as well as losing all colonies and had to cede territories. This caused Germany’s to suffer from economic collapse,and hyperinflation had caused civilians lives to be harsh. Many lost their jobs as well. The civilians thought the government at the time,Weimar Republic was weak and unable to solve the problems hence wished for a stronger leader. This again contributed to the rise of Hitler.

As Nazism rise, the nation adopted an expansionism policy hence actively invading other nations. It was until Germany set it's hand on Czechoslovakia that Britain and Frace decide it can no longer be tolerated,thus WWII broke out.

Hope it helps!
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why did Columbus think he had reached Asia when he landed in the Americas?
    8·2 answers
  • What ideas did Isaac Newton contribute to the Scientific Revolution?
    10·2 answers
  • How did the fur trade encourage French exploration of North America
    5·1 answer
  • The Cold War was a conflict between __________.
    7·2 answers
  • Which of the following is the most popular abolitionist?
    13·2 answers
  • Which basic principle that we use today was established by the Magna Carta?
    5·2 answers
  • What did the yalta conference fail to achieve?
    14·1 answer
  • Why were Americans, including President Jefferson, unable to to treat Haitians as “brave and courageous human beings"
    13·1 answer
  • Will mark Brainliest for best answer.
    13·2 answers
  • Compare and contrast the reproduction, growth, and development of chickens and humans. How do they differ? How are they similar?
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!