Octopuses have:
-eight arms
-bulbous heads
-three hearts
-blue blood
-ink defenses
-no bones
The ability to fit into small spaces
-intelligent minds (they have been recorded using tools, etc.)
Not too sure how to specify, but nonetheless those are eight characteristics of an octopus. Hope this helps :)
Plagiarism is where you take someone else’s words or work and claim them as your own. If you do there are serious consequences on performing plagiarism, for example jail time. So if I were to copy and paste from the internet to an online essay and it was someone’s else’s work, the teacher can get you into trouble. Plagiarism is the process of using someone’s else’s work, but when doing so the person whom created the piece that you stolen and had claimed can and will sue you for it. So Plagiarism is not worth doing so for the charges that can be pressed soon you.
Answer:
"gong clangs" and "siren howls"
Explanation:
An auditory sensation is one pertaining to the sense of hearing. This is the only option that describes sound.
If you have any further questions about this poem, William Carlos Williams, Imagism, or American Literature in general feel free to leave a comment or message me.
It honestly sounds greedy lol
Basically its saying photography has become a bit too focused on the past - even if it’s the immediate past. Just take all that talk about, let’s say, how colour photography became an accepted part of art photography (you could also pick the New Topographics<span> or whatever else). And then re-read the quotes…
or saying </span> <span>Fitting in is a necessary, but not sufficient criterion.
Being new is not sufficient.
Popularity right now is not enough.
Someone liking the poem now is not enough.
Does a poem conform to the new times?
Is a poem individual and different?
These are coexisting requirements for a poem to be valuable.
>is a work of art that conforms completely really a work of art?
"Conforming", in the sense of forming the leadership for a new age.
Yes, conforming is a necessary, but not sufficient requirement for a poem:
"its fitting in is a test of its value–a test,"
>should contemporary works of art be judged as “better” or “worse” than past ones?
There is no way that new poems be as bad as old poems, or their canons.
"certainly not judged by the canons of dead critics."</span>
