They joined in 1941 so maybe around 2-4 ..
<u>Answer:
</u>
The step of the listening process that involves assigning meaning to sounds, according to your own values, beliefs, ideas, expectations, roles, needs, and personal history is referred to as decoding.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
- When we listen to something, our brain automatically processes the syllables and sounds to derive meaning out of them.
- This action carried out by the brain is called 'decoding' which is a part of the process of listening.
- The operation of decoding is supported by the knowledge that we already have about the syllables that fall on our ears.
Wealth had become concentrated in the hands of foreign investors and a small Mexican elite. Most mexicans lived in poverty and opposition to diez grew steadily. In 1910 porifio diez ran for a re-election , as in earlier elections diez controlled the outcome just before the election began he jailed his opponant Francisco Madero. When the ballots were counted diez claimed he had a million votes and Madero had fewer than 200. Good luck! :D
Compare and contrast how people have historically treated natural resources and how this might change, using your new understanding of scarcity, conservation, and private property.
Answer: In the past people treated natural resources as an infinite source of wealth and commodity. But now that we know that there are physical limits to nonrenewable resources we have taken a new approach to preserve this resources by taking measures like natural resource management. A great example of this would be a private property regime where the resources benefits and duties fall under the owner(s).
I hope it helps, Regards.
There was a natural harmony among man. If a man wanted to be respected from others he had to respect others. Family ties were very important and set a model for the government. A son has to respect his father and a father should take care of and respect his son. The son was even to obey and submit to his father even when his father neglected him. This is not to say that the father could get away with neglecting his son. The same goes for citizens and their leader.
