A decline in the real GDP that occurs for at least two or more quarters is called a depression. The correct option among all the options that are given in the question is option "b". There is a very thin line of difference between recession and depression. when the real GDP falls for a repeated number of periods, then it is depression.
Answer: Trade obstacle
Explanation:
From the information given, we can infer that the demands are examples of trade obstacle.
Trade obstacles refers to the barriers which hinder a trade or the restrictions on an international trade. Trade obstacles can be tariffs or other non-tariff methods. Trade obstacles lead to difficulties in the sale of a product to other countries.
Construction expenditures should be debited when <u>D. The bill is approved for payment.</u>
<u>Explanation:</u>
In the above scenario, Acme Construction Co. submitted bill amount of $1,200,000 on a construction contract. The payment of the bill was approved on May 2. According to the contract, 10% was subject to retention.
This construction expenditure is debited when the bill is approved for payment. Contract includes all the details regarding payment and terms and conditions between the companies or parties.
Once the bill submitted by company is approved, then the retention amount will be automatically debited.
Answer:
The firm paid $630000 dividends in 2019
Explanation:
Retained earnings is the amount of net income that is not distributed to stockholders and is ploughed back into the business. It is a capital reserve account and appears in the equity section of the Balance Sheet. To determine the amount of Dividends, we will trace the change in Retained earnings and deduct the increase in retained earnings amount from the Net Income to arrive at dividends for the year.
Increase in Retained earnings = 4000000 - 3700000 = $300000
Thus, out of the Net Income of $930000 earned in 2019, $300000 was transferred to retained earnings. The remaining was paid as dividends.
The dividends in 2019 are = 930000 - 300000 = $630000
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although the question is incomplete because it does not attach the model to answer it we can comment on the following.
The problem is that Jamal, trying to increase profits, decided to sell two different products that are not part of the Subway products. When the franchisor visited Jamal's location, it realized the changes and set an ultimatum to Jamal to respect the franchise agreement.
The cause of the problem is that although Jamal wanted to diversify the products to have more income, this contradicts and is against the franchise agreement he signed when he bought the Subway franchise. The contract clearly states that the owner of the franchise can only sell products authorized in the contract by Subway. That is exactly one of the characteristics of a franchise. That you visit one of them any place in the world, and you are going to find de the same products with the same quality. That is the product guarantee of a franchise like Subway.
So the effects for the company are that its reputation an image can be questioned for selling different products that are hot approved by Subway. It is a major risk the company is not going to allow. Furthermore, it is stated in the contract. So Jamal has no right to break it.
One possible solution is that Jamal respects those 30 days to make the proper corrections, follow the guidelines established in the Subway's manuals, offer a sincere apology, and commit himself to operate the franchise just as it is stated on the agreement.
