The government can control tariffs and can limit how much can be imported into the usa.
The government can provide subsidies to certain producers, typically farmers.
The government can put a ceiling and a floor on prices as they wish. They can control the lowest and highest price a commodity can sell for.
The government can own public works such as a water company if they feel they can provide the service for a lower cost than the local competitors.
The government can decide which companies are monopolies and which companies are violating federal policies regarding trade. The government has the power to break up monopolies.
Each of these has advantages and disadvantages. For example, for farmers, when prices on their crops are too low, the government "gives" them money for their crops so they can stay in business.
A monopoly business controls the price and supply. If the monopoly is broken up, then competitors can enter the field- this can help drive down prices.
If the government can provide utility services for cheaper, that is good.
let the customer drink it?
Answer:
idk, just go for it if its wut u want
Explanation:
Solution:
Pick some smart number for x,
let x=2 (I chose x=2 as in this case monthly shipments would be X/2=1).
From January to April, inclusive 4x=8 brooms were produced and
in May the company paid for storage of 8-1 =7 brooms,
in next month for storage of 6 and so on.
So the total storage cost would be:
= 1 ∗ (7+6+5+4+3+2+1+0)
= 28
--> as x=2 , then 28 = 14x
So the answer is 14x
Answer:
the expected return on the portfolio is 14.77%
Explanation:
The computation of the expected return on the portfolio is shown below:
The expected return is
= ($1,600 ÷ $4,300) × 11% + ($2,700 ÷ $4,300) × 17%
= 14.767 %
= 14.77%
The $4,300 comes from
= $1,600 + $2,700
= $4,300
hence, the expected return on the portfolio is 14.77%
The same is considered