Answer:
b. helped create and spread a new celebrity culture.
Explanation:
In the 1920s, movies, radios, and phonographs <u>helped create and spread a new celebrity culture</u>. In the 1920s, The media was so concerned with the lives of celebrities and famous individuals, they were talked about them on radios, their lifestyles were portrayed in movies and they covered the pages of phonographic magazines. This actually helped in the spread of the celebrity culture which was just a rising thing then.
When showing symptoms that make her look older than her age, Karla would likely be diagnosed with progeria.
<h3 /><h3>What is progeria?</h3>
It corresponds to a rare and non-hereditary syndrome, where a mutation of the LMNA gene, causing premature aging during childhood, reduces the patient's life expectancy.
Therefore, despite being an incurable syndrome, after diagnosis there is a delay in the genetic disorder through the use of drugs prescribed by a doctor.
Find out more about progeria here:
brainly.com/question/15649981
#SPJ1
The correct answer is content analysis
Content analysis although most classical content analysis culminates in numerical descriptions of some features of the body of the text, considerable attention is being paid to the types, qualities and distinctions in the text, before any quantification is made. Content analysis traditionally works with written textual materials. There are two types of texts: texts that are constructed in the research process, such as interview transcripts and observation protocols; texts that have already been produced for any other purpose, such as newspapers or corporate memos. In content analysis, the starting point is the message, but the contextual conditions of its producers must be considered and it is based on the critical and dynamic conception of language. It must be considered, not only the semantics of the language, but also the interpretation of the meaning that an individual attributes to the messages. The analysis of the content, in its first uses, is very similar to the process of categorization and tabulation of answers to open questions.
Being made president the three cuts i would mare would be in the following areas, taxes, Government spending and cut unnecessary ministries or departments.
The fist big cut I would make would be tax cuts, the reason for this is the less taxes are charged on the populaiton the more money said population will have to spend on goods and services adn thus circulate in the economy. This would also mean less tax breaks for the wealthly, thus removing their privileges of avoiding taxes through charities.
The second big cut I would make would be in government spending, or more specifically reducing or cutting the salaries of career politicians by 30% to 40%. This is becasue the government with is the largest spender of capital in any given country while being the lowest producer of capital and it is unsustainable to maintain large political salaries. With this cut it would not only alleviate the tax payer, but also free up remaining funds for health and educaiton.
Finally the last cuts I would make would be in the area of departments or ministries. While some such as the department of Agriculture and Interior incompatible and cannot be fused, other such as the departmetn of labour and Treasury can be fused, reducing the number of departments and thus overall government spending again.
These are the three be cuts I would make as President.