The Mexican Revolution<span> was a major armed struggle </span>1910–1920<span> radically transforming </span>Mexican culture<span> and </span>government. Although recent research has focused on local and regional aspects of the Revolution, it was a genuinely national revolution<span> Its outbreak in 1910 resulted from the failure of the 35-year long regime of </span>Porfirio Díaz<span> to find a managed solution to the presidential succession. This meant there was a political crisis among competing elites and the opportunity for agrarian insurrection. </span><span>Wealthy landowner </span>Francisco I. Madero<span>challenged Díaz in the 1910 presidential election, and following the rigged results, revolted under the </span>Plan of San Luis Potosí.<span>Armed conflict ousted Díaz from power and a new election was held in 1911, bringing Madero to the presidency.
Hope i helped
-Hind :)</span>
World War One, or the Great War, is often considered a prime example of total war for a number of reasons. First off, let us examine what the meaning of "Total War" actually means. Total War can be defined as a war that involves nearly everyone in the countries involved, not just soldiers and politicians. Citizens namely: the old, the weak, children, women, injured, etc. In WW1 women and children were grabbed in the streets and forced to work in factories to assemble and create war machines. Merchant ships were torpedoed and sunk, cities bombed, and set on fire - all in the name of terrorizing the people of the country and waning down their public opinion of the war. <span>Countries in WW1 needed the help of all of their citizens to fight in such a global conflict, so the governments would take over almost all of the industry and redirect it towards the war effort. Lastly, in the case of WW1 by 1915 (a year into the war) no country was attempting to gain land, power, or anything else of that nature. Instead, their sole goal was to survive, which meant the total unconditional destruction and surrender of the opposing side. Therefore, total warfare.</span>
The second one I think it is
Based off of history, Natives generally did not give up land easily nor coexist, meaning they would often violently revolt against anyone taking their land.
The European colonists were also mostly against friendly Native American relations.
Also, William Bradford, along with his origins, were greatly Separatist, which means they involved God into their lives immensely.
So, it is safe to say that the answer is the third one.
