Answer:
Taking into account photosynthesis, the evidence that best supports the law of energy conservation is energy is absorbed by chlorophyll and becomes chemical energy during photosynthesis (option 2).
Explanation:
Plants are autotrophic organisms, characterized by synthesizing their own nutrients by converting solar energy into chemical energy through photosynthesis.
During the process of photosynthesis, chloroplasts are capable of absorbing solar energy and converting it into glucose. This process involves the conversion of one type of energy into another.
With respect to the law of conservation of energy, it is necessary to consider:
- In the universe there is a constant amount of matter and energy, which is neither created nor destroyed, but transformed.
- Energy in an isolated system does not vary, unless it comes into contact with another system.
- The amount of energy that is absorbed and obtained is equivalent.
In photosynthesis, the chloroplast is not an isolated system, but has contact with the outside and is capable of absorbing the energy of the sun. This energy will be used to obtain a product, glucose, in an amount proportional to the amount of energy absorbed.
Regarding other options:
<em> 1. In photosynthesis, it is not </em><u><em>mechanical energy</em></u><em> that is transformed into chemical energy.</em>
<em> 3. </em><u><em>Oxygen is a product of photosynthesis</em></u><em>, during the process of chemical energy synthesis, from the combination of carbon dioxide, water and solar energy.</em>
<em> 4. It is true that the </em><u><em>sun gives off light energy that is absorbed by plants</em></u><em>, but it does not explain how this energy is transformed into chemical energy.</em>
Speed of light is usually time and space so probably C
<span>Presence of oxygen means that the organisms are not anaerobic so the answer is D. algae. Eukaryotic and prokaryotic cells can be anaerobic meaning that they live in circumstances where there's no oxygen. Algae were the first that required oxygen to thrive. Cyanobacteria are like other bacteria parts of the prokaryotic cell type.</span>
The human eye has three types of cone cells. These cones respond to the light and its varying signals wavelengths determines how the brain will perceive the lights signals and determine the colors the person sees.
Damage to any one of the types of cone cells doesn't cause total blindness because they have independent structure and are parallel to each other. Instead, damage to any one of the types of cone may cause COLOR BLINDNESS.
Answer:
The Continental Drift theory is a theory because there is no evidence to support it. Alfred Wegener developed the Continental Drift theory in the 1800's.
