To be reticent is to not reveal one's thoughts readily. In this case, it is the reticence of the author. The author does not reveal their thoughts readily. If the narrator or author refuses to do something, it is made known that he is doing something. The something here is him refusing. If he acts as if the situation is normal, I'd assume he is acting in such a way that would be nonreactionary of the actions from the provoker. I would safely choose the last option as sorrentino's exercising of authorial reticence.
character vs. character, because his father's words cause him to question his actionscharacter vs. nature, because he must battle the elements of weathercharacter vs. self, because he is struggling to understand how the gods livedcharacter vs. society, because he must battle against the teachings of the gods
character vs. self, because he is struggling to understand how the gods lived
Answer: Option 3.
<u>Explanation:</u>
In the field of literature, a conflict is a struggle that takes place between two different forces. It can be one side of the character with the other side of the character or between two people and so on.
In the lesson "By the waters of Babylon" the conflict and the struggle is between the character and the self. The sentence that is an evidence of this conflict is "I do not understand"they had ways"I wish that I knew".