The answer is B.
Schenk vs US involves a freedom of speech case in which Schenk encouraged American citizens to avoid the military draft during World War I.
The Supreme Court ruled this was not protected free speech because it provides a clear and present danger to American citizens. The court felt that influencing people to not join the war presented a danger to America’s war effort.
Great Britain remembered the war because they had a conflict France. Overall, the British won. Count that as their victory.
The role of The Dust Bowl<span> in the history of the United States of America. ... The farming practices that made the plains so productive were beginning to </span>take<span> a toll on the land. The grasslands ... Roosevelt believed it was the federal </span>government`<span>s duty to help the American </span>people<span> get through the bad times </span>like<span> the </span>Dust Bowl<span>.</span>
Gouverneur Morris of Pennsylvania and John Rutledge of South
Carolina were known to be supporter of strong central government. They believe
that states would be ineffective in governing when they are left alone. They
want the national government to have absolute control.
Hello. You forgot to put the text to which this question refers. The text is:
The great idea in Article V is that change requires two elements: consensus and necessity. There must be substantive national agreement, as well as agreement in most of the states, that an urgent problem exists that cannot be remedied by the courts, legislatures or Congress, and which can be solved only if the Constitution is changed.
—Mary Frances Berry, The New York Times, September 13, 1987
Answer:
Amending the Constitution
Explanation:
The above text reflects on how the constitution changes through amendments should be. the author of the text shows that the amendments should only be approved when there is a mutual agreement between several factors that prove and justify that there is a problem in society that is impossible to be solved by courts, legislatures or Congress. Furthermore, this problem needs to be solved with such urgency that only an amendment to the constitution, that is, a modification of the constitution can solve it. If this condition were not proposed, the constitution would run the risk of being a set of temporary laws with little or no real influence.
