1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
yaroslaw [1]
3 years ago
10

The byzantine empire replaced the western roman empire after the fall of rome. true false

History
1 answer:
Nutka1998 [239]3 years ago
8 0
Replaced how?  If you mean like the Roman empire, that would be incorrect.  Both empires considered each other Roman and both empires considered themselves Roman.  So when the west fell, the Byzantines did not 'replace' the western Romans in being Roman. Instead, they just kept on being Roman as their western counterparts fell.  However, for a period, the Byzantines did manage to reconquer parts of the Western Empire and even Rome, but that was relatively short-lived.  In that case, you could argue that the Byzantines sort of did replace the western Romans in being the Roman empire with Rome in its possession. However, that is a stretch in my opinion. 

In short: False, the Eastern Romans did not replace the western Romans as they were both seen as Romans, just with different governments.
You might be interested in
What did the Virginia Plan propose the elimination of?
Setler79 [48]

Answer:

Explanation:

Fuge

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How were the SNCC and CORE routes similar and different? <br> please help me
Lilit [14]

Answer:

They were also more willing to take risks and put their bodies on the line Religion was also a main difference SCLC was based in the southern Baptist church. Civil rights movement drew on religious values. Churches were key organizing sites for black protestors SNCC was primarily secular.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Which european countries are not dominated by indo-european speakers?
Marianna [84]
Spain because they speak Spanish!! Hope this helps!! :)
5 0
3 years ago
50 POINTS ANSWER ASAP Which statement best explains the pharaoh’s role in the economy? The pharaoh only taxed the wealthy. The p
ASHA 777 [7]

Answer: it is b. the pharaoh owned all land and wealth.

Explanation: i took the quiz. ur welcome <33

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
7. The United States Constitution corrected a weakness of the Articles of Confederation by
Artemon [7]

Answer: providing a clear definition of states right

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How were civilians affected by the siege of Vicksburg?
    8·2 answers
  • In what part of Africa did the practice of slavery most deplete the population?
    7·1 answer
  • Which of the following is an example of the supreme court limiting the free exercise of religion
    10·1 answer
  • Describe three ways in which Russia differed from Western European countries in the 1600s and explain the reasons for those diff
    5·1 answer
  • Why should Europe and other developed countries be concerned about the
    15·1 answer
  • 9. What are the consequences of proposed amendments, including deadlines for <br> ratification?
    7·1 answer
  • I have been the most persevering and determined public man in my State to preserve the Union—the last to abandon the hope, that
    6·1 answer
  • What was the importance of the Federal Highway Act of 1956? It established tolls on highways, which funded new home construction
    14·1 answer
  • 10 points
    14·1 answer
  • In all three major empires , were an impactful physical feature because of the fresh water they provided crops, transportation,
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!