In the 3rd century, a serious crisis that had a huge influence on the disintegration of the Roman Empire. Taken by a territory of great proportions, the State was unable to maintain its political-administrative hegemony among the various peoples that were under its control. At the same time that the wealth obtained was immense, the problems and expenses were also manifested in a similar proportion.
The scenario worsened with the crisis of the slave system, triggered by the absence of new territories to be conquered and which, in turn, would guarantee the supply of the huge workforce that supported the Empire. As time went by, the lack of slaves determined a natural process of economic retraction, since landowners could not afford to explore all the land available for agricultural activity.
The rich and dynamic economy sustained by slave labor began to crumble progressively. Without strength, the Roman government would allow barbarians to enter its dominions, a large number of slaves would be freed by the retraction of the economy and the large plebeian mass, supported by the government, would lose its privileges. In the economic sphere, activities would abandon an articulated market and then turn to local subsistence.
Observing the triggering of these events, we see that the Roman Empire lost the fundamental characteristics that organized its own existence. In general, we see that over the decades, a large portion of those domains would be marked by other characteristics and practices in the cultural, economic and political spheres. The crisis was taking place, so that we could develop experiences that would mark the beginning of the Middle Ages.
When one of the branches want more power, yes. But that is why we have 3 branches and checks and balances. We have those to prevent one branch from obtaining too much power. When the president wants a bill to be passed that will benefit the people and the legislative branch doesn't like it or the judicial branch says it is unconstitutional, then the bill cannot be passed.
I think it’s b because When you have to go to the court Are you going with in the state in which you’re living and I think Hopefully I helped you
Answer:
Eligibility
Passed 10+2 Science or equivalent (with Physics, Chemistry, and Biology) with 50% aggregate in total marks or GPA 2.4 OR.
Secured the percentage equivalent to above eligibility in regards to the certificate level programs (eg.
No I do not agree with this statement that juveniles who commit violent crime should be sentenced to life in prison without parole because it is unconstitutional.
Explanation:
A study on adolescent’s brain development confirms the understanding that children the mindset of the children different from adults, which is important for identifying age-appropriate sentence for the crimes they commit.
Instead to control the juvenile crimes, the government needs to form and implement some strict laws which can really make some kind of fear in the mind of the children before they go on the path of crime.
