Answer:
Do you mean past simple? If so the answer is below
The Past Simple tense, also called the Simple Past, is used for past actions that happened either at a specific time, which can either be given by a time phrase (yesterday, last year, etc.) or could be understood from the context.
Explanation:
The Past Simple tense, also called the Simple Past, is used for past actions.
The answer is a. metaphor
<u>Answer</u>:
B: When running for a political office, a candidate must be willing to fight for his positions, to state his beliefs articulately, and look confident while doing so.
This statement has been written correctly.
<u>Explanation</u>:
Punctuation is very important in a writing. The reader can understand the meaning properly and even the writing appears more appealing. Without punctuation, correct meaning might not reach to the reader. He might lose his interest in reading.
Option B has correct punctuation marks, i.e. there is a comma after office and after positions. Also, “to state his beliefs” is grammatically correct. In other options, use of “stating his beliefs” in Option D and “to look confident” in Option C makes both the sentences grammatically wrong. In Option A, use of ‘state his beliefs’ and ‘to look’ are incorrect as well.
Answer:
1. No, I do not have brain.
2. Yes, I am lazy
3. Yes, I am very dirty
lol
Answer:
The similarity between the accounts presented in the primary source article "indicted her for murder" and the secondary source "midnight assassin" is that Both suggest that Mrs. Hossack may have had a possible motive for killing her husband.
Explanation:
The question is not complete since it does not provide the options to answer it, here are the options:
A:Both suggest that Mrs. Hossack’s attorneys do not actually believe in her innocence.
B:Both suggest that a nearby neighbor had a history of heated arguments with Mr. Hossack.
C:Both suggest that Mrs. Hossack may have had a possible motive for killing her husband.
D:Both suggest that the Hossack children had likely motives for killing Mr. Hossack.
The two references express the fact that Mrs, Hossack was in the house as Mr. Hossack was being struck over the head and killed, at his home a few miles out from Bedford. This makes her a principal suspect and connects both sources, both the article and the book focus on that point in common even when they are written in different ways.
