Option A. If a historian takes a source out of context, she is likely to:
A. misunderstand the intended meaning of historical actions.
<h3>What does it mean to take things out of context?</h3>
This is used to refer to the fact that a person is taking what is being said outside of the meaning that the message is supposed to convey. It has to do with not being able to understand what is said and interpreting it accordingly.
In this situation, when the historian takes things out of their context, then it means that they would not understand the true meaning of the happenings of that period.
Read more on historical events here: brainly.com/question/17040564
#SPJ1
Answer:
Explanation:
Well first of all, some people don't like specific parties cause of past history or even who they stand by. For example, the Republican Party, some people don't like Republicans because of what republicans stand by, some Republican politicians like Donald Trump, is disliked because of what he stands by. Donald Trump has done many horrible things which has also made his Party look bad. They also helped shape the public's opinion. ... I think political parties emerged even though most Americans opposed them because their are many people with strong opinions. When these people stood up for what they wanted, their were followers.
I think is should be all. Idk about moose cause Deer and Bears are woodland.
By the late 1860s, Americans in various towns and cities had begun holding springtime tributes to these countless fallen soldiers, decorating their graves with flowers and reciting prayers.
Hope this helps!
