the flooding of the Nile River during the great tide
an economic crisis brought on by famine
NextReset
Answer:
The answer represents the interpretation of both the query given.
Explanation:
- The Roman Empire was an ancient Roman humankind's comment-Republican era, marked by an authoritarian system of government including vast territorial possessions throughout Europe, Asia as well as Africa across the Mediterranean this same 500-year-old Empire, that also accompanied it, had already been destabilized by several battles.
- The transformation from Republic towards Empire was characterized by many incidents, along with the naming of Julius Caesar as a perpetual emperor, the Battle of Actium as well as the awarding by both the Roman Senate including its honorary Augustus to Octavian.
- That the very first 2 decades of both the Empire were an era recognized as either the Pax Romana of unparalleled peace and prosperity. Mostly during tenure under Trajan, it achieved its fullest degree.
In the late 1940s, the United States responded to the growing threat presented by the Soviet Union by trying to stem the tide of Communism by supporting and propping up governments that opposed Communism.
For more than a decade after its passage, the Sherman Act was invoked only rarely against industrial monopolies, and then not successfully, chiefly because of narrow judicial interpretations of what constitutes trade or commerce among states. When it was first passed, the Sherman Antitrust Act was largely ineffective at stopping industrial monopolies. Courts at the time tended to hold a very narrow view of what constituted “trade or commerce among states,” and most companies were not held liable under the act. For more than a decade after its passage, the Sherman Antitrust Act was invoked only rarely against industrial monopolies, and then not successfully. Ironically, its only effective use for a number of years was against labor unions, which were held by the courts to be illegal combinations.
Answer:
Citizens elect leaders who vote on the issues in a representative democracy, and citizens vote on the issues in a direct democracy.
Explanation:
This is true, while the rest are false. Representative democracy was designed for large groups, not small, and direct democracies are designed for small, not large groups. The last option is wrong because the reason citizens elect their representative is so they can represent their desires and needs. And as for the 2nd option that representative democracy is modern and direct democracy is ancient, that just isn't a valid reason.
