Government which would be considered as a moral type of a government is one which ensures equality in terms of opportunities for every individual or one that is democratic in nature
The answer will depend on two things, where in Asia and when in Asian you're referring to. You have to remember that the Mongol Empire was the largest the world has ever seen, and stretched from parts of South Asia all the way into parts of Eastern Europe. Due to this, their society was different depending on where you found them. Often, the Mongols would begin to adopt parts of the society of the areas they occupied (i.e. The Mongols in the Middle East/Central Asia began to adopt Islam as their religion, and reflected it in their culture, while Mongols who occupied China would take on more Chinese ways of life.)
As for mongol society that didn't involve this "borrowing of culture," The Mongols were nomadic peoples that lived throughout Central and Northern Asia. They were originally series of many different tribes, but eventually became united under Ghangis Khan through his policies of marrying off his children to other tribes rulers, simple alliances, and sometimes force.
The Mongol Empire also brought a lot to Asia (some people see their Empire as having been a benefit to the whole of Asia, really). Since most of Asia was dominated by the one empire, trading became much easier, with trade routes becoming more secure. Besides the spread of goods through trade, they also helped to spread ideas for the same reason. Several countries connected together by one Empire allowed the Mongols to spread ideas throughout their empire. In modern day you can still find Influences of the Mongol Empire in Asia, such as the continued practice of Islam in Central Asian and Western China, or the fact that they had helped several cities develop more quickly, thus cementing their place in history.
Answer: found this on a wiki hope it helps. Emmett Louis Till (July 25, 1941 – August 28, 1955) was a 14-year-old African American who was lynched in Mississippi in 1955, after being accused of offending a white woman in her family's grocery store. The brutality of his murder and the fact that his killers were acquitted drew attention to the long history of violent persecution of African Americans in the United States. Till posthumously became an icon of the civil rights movement.[1]
Till was born and raised in Chicago, Illinois. During summer vacation in August 1955, he was visiting relatives near Money, in the Mississippi Delta region. He spoke to 21-year-old Carolyn Bryant, the white married proprietor of a small grocery store there. Although what happened at the store is a matter of dispute, Till was accused of flirting with or whistling at Bryant. In 1955, Bryant had testified that Till made physical and verbal advances. The jury did not hear Bryant's testimony, due to the judge ruling it inadmissible.[2][3] Decades later, historian Timothy Tyson interviewed Bryant and wrote a book in which he claimed that she had disclosed that she had fabricated part of the testimony regarding her interaction with Till, specifically the portion where she accused Till of grabbing her waist and uttering obscenities; "That part's not true," Tyson claimed that Bryant stated in a 2008 interview with him.[2][4][5] Till's interaction with Bryant, perhaps unwittingly if at all, violated the strictures of conduct for an African-American male interacting with a white woman in the Jim Crow-era South.[6] Several nights after the incident in the store, Bryant's husband Roy and his half-brother J.W. Milam were armed when they went to Till's great-uncle's house and abducted the boy. They took him away and beat and mutilated him before shooting him in the head and sinking his body in the Tallahatchie River. Three days later, Till's body was discovered and retrieved from the river.
Explanation:
Didn’t ask is the correct answer
