The answer to this problem is C
Formal Education doesn’t always lead to wealth creation in all aspect.
10 reasons which states that formal education doesn’t necessarily lead to wealth creation:-
1) Formal education teaches us to prepare for the exams that we need to pass to achieve good marks.
2) Formal education is a part of one’s success but not solely the only reason behind it. It doesn’t excel you in all life exams.
3) Formal education doesn’t teach us the personal passion that one should have to achieve wealth.
4) It helps in learning the means of wealth creation but doesn’t teach the hard-work and perseverance to attain it.
5) Formal education is of no use if we don’t apply it in our life.
6) The formal education doesn’t give the vision to attain the principles of life that one should follow in wealth creation.
7) Formal education is necessary to acquire a job or business but one need the intelligence to retain it.
8) We can only learn from formal education but can’t learn the act to achieve success.
9) It doesn’t teach creativity, one should be talented to gain wealth
10) It doesn’t teach us patience that we need to achieve anything.
Answer:
Due to increase in the unsafe and unsanitary practices in both industries.
Explanation:
The Meat Inspection Act and Pure Food and Drug Act, was enacted in 1906, by the 59th United States congress, for the purpose of banning the unsafe and unsanitary practices of the meatpacking industry and as well the foreign and interstate traffic in adulterated or mislabeled food and drug products.
Both Acts was passed on President Theodore Roosevelt on June 30th 1906. It was on of the key price of Progressive Era legislation.
This could be a lot of things.
I am going to go with just one that I think has changed the world.
The King James Bible was commissioned in English in 1611 as the official authorized Bible for the Church of England.
It is a monumental work of the English language and would not have been possible without the formation of the Church of England.
Answer: In simplest terms, the Boston Tea Party happened as a result of “taxation without representation”, yet the cause is more complex than that. The American colonists believed Britain was unfairly taxing them to pay for expenses incurred during the French and Indian War.