Answer:
c
Explanation:
if it was never in stock its misleading and a fraud
Answer:
Chris paid $109.68 for his bond. Since he paid a premium for the bond, the YTM is lower than the coupon rate.
Explanation:
yield of Cheryl's bond is 6% since she purchased it at par and the bond's coupon is 6%
if Chris's bond yields 80% of Cheryl's, it will yield 6% x 0.8 = 4.8%
we can use the approximate yield to maturity formula to find the market price of Chris's bond:
2.4%(semiannual) = {3 + [(100 - MV)/20]} / [(100 + MV)/2]
0.024 x [(100 + MV)/2] = 3 + [(100 - MV)/20]
0.024 x (50 + 0.5MV) = 3 + 5 - 0.05MV
1.2 + 0.012MV = 8 - 0.05MV
0.062MV = 6.8
MV = 6.8 / 0.062 = 109.68
The correct answer is A. During 2009 real GDP in Viloxia grew by 2 percent, which is about the same as average U.S. growth over the last one-hundred years.
Given that in 2009, the imaginary nation of Viloxia had a population of 5,000 and real GDP of 500,000, and in 2010 it had a population of 5,100 and real GDP of 520,200, to determine the growth of real GDP in Viloxia during 2009, the the following calculations must be made:
- Total GDP / population = real GDP
- 500,000 / 5000 = X
- 100 = X
- 520,200 / 5100 = X
- 102 = X
- 102 - 100 = 2
Therefore, during 2009 Viloxia's GDP grew by 2 percent, which is about the same as average U.S. growth over the last one-hundred years.
Learn more in brainly.com/question/4131508
Traditionally, the formulas used to express a firm's cost of equity are the dividend capitalization model and the capital asset pricing model (CAPM).
Explanation:
Generally, two risk components determine a firm's cost of equity. The first is the systematic risk associated with the broader equity market. All firms are exposed to this risk, and it cannot be mitigated through diversification.
The second risk component is the unsystematic risk associated with the firm in question. This risk, often reflected as beta, a measure of the stock's volatility in relation to the volatility of the broader market, can be mitigated via diversification.
