1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Paraphin [41]
3 years ago
11

How were roman censors different from tribunes ?

History
2 answers:
RideAnS [48]3 years ago
8 0

Roman Censors were responsible for maintaining the census, supervising public morality and some aspects of the government's finances.

The Roman Tribune was an officer of the Roman Army who ranked below the legate and above the centurion. They had the ability to prohibit and forbid by making new laws. They were responsible for protecting the common people.

Vika [28.1K]3 years ago
3 0
Censors took the census and kept moral order, while the tribune was an elected official of the plebeians.
You might be interested in
Which African kingdom used seashells as its main form of currency?
Over [174]
The African kingdom that used seashells as it is form of currency is Mali Kingdom 
5 0
4 years ago
Someone please help ASAP will give brainliest
Rus_ich [418]
Germany not being punished in the war would have made the nazi party more of a fringeparty
7 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did the boundaries of the United States change during the 1840s
KatRina [158]

Answer: The U.S gained the area of Colorado, Utah, Nevada, California, Arizona, and New Mexico.

Explanation:

The Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo granted the U.S these lands after Mexico failed to win the Mexican-American War.

5 0
3 years ago
Help me<br> plsssssssssssssss
igomit [66]

Answer:

Thank yo for asking this...I was waiting for someone to ask me this.

EXPLANATION: This article examines the extent to which state officials are subject to prosecution in foreign domestic courts for international crimes. We consider the different types of immunity that international law accords to state officials, the reasons for the conferment of this immunity and whether they apply in cases in which it is alleged that the official has committed an international crime. We argue that personal immunity (immunity ratione personae) continues to apply even where prosecution is sought for international crimes

4 0
3 years ago
What is lacerating?Help??????
VladimirAG [237]

Answer:

lacerating: severely critical or hurtful.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which country has a direct democracy
    10·2 answers
  • The Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment is not absolute. What religious practice is illegal based on the Supreme Court c
    13·1 answer
  • How are representative democracy and direct democracy alike?
    15·1 answer
  • Select the correct answer.
    11·2 answers
  • Can someone help me with this one
    9·1 answer
  • The women's movement helped married women gain the right to own<br> property.
    15·1 answer
  • What 500 year old objects does the team find in lake pumacocha on the way to paititi?
    6·2 answers
  • Why was federal ruling system implemented in nepal ? give any four reasons in points​
    10·1 answer
  • Was the mission san antonio de valero successful?
    12·2 answers
  • Who were Sacco and Vanzetti? What happened to them? Why did it happen?
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!