As for advantages, the article shows that handwriting can promote psychological improvements, optimize the ability to concentrate, and improve writing and reading skills. As for disadvantages, she claims that handwriting is slow, obsolete, and used less and less nowadays. The author concludes that mastery of calligraphy is not important and can be abandoned without major consequences.
We can arrive at this answer because:
- The author states that handwriting is something that has become obsolete over time.
- This is because, smartphones and computers are increasingly modern, the need for the use of handwriting has decreased.
- Although handwriting has b, the author says that abandoning it will not cause disastrous changes, but will promote the optimization of technological resources.
Although the abandonment of handwriting has advantages and disadvantages, we can confirm that its use has become increasingly rare. Furthermore, current technology allows us to encourage the advantages of not mastering handwriting and combat the disadvantages.
You can learn more about technological advancements at the link:
brainly.com/question/17893201
Answer:
Deductive logic
Explanation:
The Cognitive development theory of Jean Piaget suggests that there are four stages through which a child develops mentally.
The fourth or the last stage of the theory is the Formal Operational Stage. <u>This occurs at the age of 12 and above. In this stage, a child develops through certain skills such as </u><u>systematic planning</u><u>, </u><u>deductive reasoning</u><u>, etc</u>.
According to Piaget, deductive logic or reasoning is a type of reasoning that involves using of general statement or hypothesis to reach a particular outcome.
The sentence given in the question is an example of deductive reasoning.
<u>The general statement is </u><u><em>"if all people are equal" </em></u><u>and the outcome abstracted from this general statement is </u><u><em>"then you and I must be equal."</em></u>
So, the correct answer is deductive reasoning.
Answer:
I would say becasue it essentially mimics the American system. If small committee chose the president, it wouldn't be representitive of the "people" or the majority.
Explanation:
