I think that the best way to complete this analogy is option a.<span>non-fiction : fiction. There is nothing in the original pair to make an analogy to the other ones, and in both pairs you could say that the first part describes a real story and the other a fictional, not a real story. </span>
The differences between the Mughal and the Ottoman Empires is that the Ottomans had a majority Christian region, while the Mughals were ruling over Hindu majority region.
Answer:
European explorers used non-European inventions such as the astrolabe, the compass, and gunpowder.
Explanation:
The other three answers are simply false. There was no interest from Asian cultures to invite trade or religious exchange. Africans and Native American were seldom used as crew on the ships.
It was the technological influence what made a difference. This is an interesting topic because it was Europeans who took advantage of those inventions.
There are theories that try to explain why didn't the Asian, and particularly the Chinese, used those inventions to explore the Pacific.
One such theory says that Europeans had a bigger need for expansion outwards, while the Chinese could focus on an internal expansion.
Both forced people to convert to their respective religions and this was the way in which the influence of Christianity and Islam on post classical society similar. The correct option among all the options that are given in the question is the first option or option "a".
