This question needs you to do a Compare and Contrast response. See the steps below for information on how to do so.
<h3>How do you write a Compare and Contrast Response?</h3>
First, keep the objective of the essay and keep it in mind until the end. The goal here is to look carefully into the text you have been given to expand the knowledge therein. In this case, the text is Tennyson's poem.
Comparison and Contrast are a way to expand knowledge. This means that you must read the text thoroughly, and highlight the similarities (compare) and differences (contrast) in the thoughts you have been asked to analyze.
See the link below on how to organize your points into a compare and contrast essay:
brainly.com/question/27014464
#SPJ1
As a huge fan of these books, I can help you here... BUT... I won't spoil it for you!
Mr. Brunner had the expectations that Percy Jackson should know the answers about the Greek gods and Latin, even when he didn't. He always looked disappointed when Percy didn't know the answer.
Percy though these expectations were unfair because he thinks that he is just a "stupid kid" and doesn't know anything, and can't be the perfect student. How wrong he is, I won't say.
Hope this helps! Have a great day!
Some ideas you can use for the beginning of your text are the Tv and the internet give you access to cultures and this is cheaper than traveling; while some ideas you can use for counterarguments are that you need to travel to have some experiences and information on Tv or internet might be incorrect.
<h3 /><h3>What does this prompt require you to do?</h3>
In this prompt you are required to write a complete article considering three main points:
- Beginning: Points that support the idea "These days, there is no point in traveling to see the world".
- Middle: Points that contradict the main idea.
- Conclusion: Ideas that wrap up the text.
<h3>What do I write in the beginning section?</h3>
Some ideas and reasons to support the main point or thesis are:
- Traveling is not necessary because through Tv or the Internet you can know about the art, food, music, etc. of many cultures around the world.
- Traveling is not necessary because the Tv and the Internet give you free access to other cultures, this means this is a cheaper way of knowing other cultures.
<h3>What do I write in the middle section?</h3>
Some counterarguments are:
- Travelling gives you unique experiences such as trying local food that are not possible through the Tv or the internet.
- While you can find information on Tv or the internet about a specific culture this information might be inaccurate or far from reality.
<h3>How do I conclude my text?</h3>
To conclude your text restate the main idea, for example you can say even if travelling has some advantages, it is not completely necessary because through Tv and the internet you can know enough about cultures in other regions of the world.
Learn more about text in: brainly.com/question/20393069
Lima (capital of Peru in South America), Madison (capital of Wisconsin in North America), London (Capital of England in Europe), Beijing (Capital of China in Asia), Canberra (Capital of Australia in, well Australia)!
I think the answer would be B
