Answer:
Stone were used
Bone
Explanation:
Throughout the Paleolithic, humans were food gatherers, depending for their subsistence on hunting wild animals and birds, fishing, and collecting wild fruits, nuts, and berries. The artifactual record of this exceedingly long interval is very incomplete; it can be studied from such imperishable objects of now-extinct cultures as were made of flint, stone, bone, and antler. These alone have withstood the ravages of time, and, together with the remains of contemporary animals hunted by our prehistoric forerunners, they are all that scholars have to guide them in attempting to reconstruct human activity throughout this vast interval—approximately 98 percent of the time span since the appearance of the first true hominin stock. In general, these materials develop gradually from single, all-purpose tools to an assemblage of varied and highly specialized types of artifacts, each designed to serve in connection with a specific function. Indeed, it is a process of increasingly more complex technologies, each founded on a specific tradition, that characterizes the cultural development of Paleolithic times. In other words, the trend was from simple to complex, from a stage of nonspecialization to stages of relatively high degrees of specialization, just as has been the case during historic times.
In the manufacture of stone implements, four fundamental traditions were developed by the Paleolithic ancestors: (1) pebble-tool traditions; (2) bifacial-tool, or hand-ax, traditions; (3) flake-tool traditions; and (4) blade-tool traditions. Only rarely are any of these found in “pure” form, and this fact has led to mistaken notions in many instances concerning the significance of various assemblages. Indeed, though a certain tradition might be superseded in a given region by a more advanced method of producing tools, the older technique persisted as long as it was needed for a given purpose. In general, however, there is an overall trend in the order as given above, starting with simple pebble tools that have a single edge sharpened for cutting or chopping. But no true pebble-tool horizons had yet, by the late 20th century, been recognized in Europe. In southern and eastern Asia, on the other hand, pebble tools of primitive type continued in use throughout Paleolithic times.
The referendum is the progressive
reform that allowed the voters to approve or reject laws passed by the
legislature.
To add, a referendum (plural referendums, see below) is a
direct vote in which an entire electorate is asked to vote on a particular
proposal.
Answer:
the end is near
Explanation:
global domination of jews
Answer:
b.
Explanation:
Based on the scenario being described within the question it can be said that these researchers found that helping tended to be higher in those countries that valued sympathy (simpatía), but was also high in some countries where this was not a value. This therefore shows that the act of helping depends on the level of sympathy in each individual and not an overall culture, which is why there was not a direct correlation between the level of a country with the amount of people that would actually provide help.
Answer:
Yes, the British did violate the colonists' rights.
Explanation:
The colonists' rights were violated because (for example) the British forced them to make space for the British soldiers to quarter (temporarily live in) their homes. Also because they imposed or forced taxes onto the colonists without their consent or allowing them to have an opinion about it (these taxes were for the British to pay their debt left over from the French and Indian war). Finally, the Colonists were prohibited from truly owning anything, from property to the very cattle they raised and the clothes they wore. Everything was property of Britain and the Crown.
Hope this helps! Have a wonderful day!
