Answer;
B. Miranda v. Arizona
Explanation;
The Miranda rights also called the Miranda warning stemmed or originated from a 1966 Supreme Court case: Miranda v. Arizona.
These rights are type of notifications customarily given by police to criminal suspects in police custody advising them of their right to silence; in other words, their right to refuse to answer questions or provide information to law enforcement or other officials.
The objective of these notification is to protect the admissibility of the criminals statements made during custodial interrogation in later criminal proceedings.
Answer:
B is the right answer I think.
In normal situations:
-The thin ascending limb is of the loop of henle is impermeable to water. But, is permeable to ions (sodium, chloride) that cross by diffusion.
-Urine osmolality should be 300-900 mOsm/kg of water.
In this case, if the <span>ascending limb of the loop of henle is permeable to water is the same as saying the loop isn't doing it's job of </span>creating a concentration gradient.
Because of that, The process of reabsorption of water and creation of a concentrated urine is not correctly happening.
The answer is E<span>. minimum 300 / maximum 300
</span>
The loop of Henle receives isotonic (300 mOsm/L) fluid, from the <span>proximal convoluted tubule, and since it's not working th way it should it won't change those values. </span>
