Answer:
The complete question is a multiple choice question, however the answer is:
self generated mediators of generalization
Explanation:
A mediator of generalization is a a stimulus that is maintained and transported by the client as part of treatment. It can be physical stimulus or a behavior which controls the behavior of the target.
Example include a parent attend a lecture on children management and then after implementing the techniques, they guide the behavior of their own child.
Individuals motivated primarily by emotions are often passionate and adventuresome.
Answer:
5 stars if they agreed and 1 star if they didn’.
Explanation:
Their motive is whether or not they like the article.
Answer: The pundit is using a NATIONAL DEFENSE ARGUMENT to justify the trade restriction.
Explanation: National defense argument is when someone is using the security of the nation to defend his argument, to be very important as the security of the nation is very important.
This type of argument always tends to use the fallacy of red herring to convince his audience about his argument. The argument sounds to be important as it used red herring to relate it's point to the security of the nation during wartime.
The pundit politician has used the fallacy of red herring to relate it's reason of increment in the tariff of semiconductor importation, to the security of the nation during war times. Therefore this is a national security argument.
They both were alike concerning finances - both wanted govt to finance improvements to run country
Both believed this could be achieved through a representative democracy
Wanted the best for the nation. (They wanted it to prosper and be strong)
Both were American Political parties
Both were a force in 1786 & 1800
They were more different then alike by far.
Hoped this helped.
