Answer:
The answer is pathos. Because its it full of emotion.
Below is a explanation, so I should'nt get reported...
Explanation:
Pathos constitutes an appeal to the emotions of an audience. It is a popular technique by orators and writers alike to connect with people on an emotional level, which is often far more moving than logic or reason.
And this is the most logical answer because if you read the paragraph about Martin Luther King Jr, and his speech "I have a dream" It is sad and emotional becuase his dream is to stop racism and to share the word that he is very hurt, and he wants everyone to treat diffrent colored people all the same. And its sad because he died because James Earl Ray shot MLKJ, And its just sad that he belived and dream that black people would be treated right. And he was killed and people belive it was because he was a black.
So the best answer would be option b) pathos
hope this helps, brainliest would help me!
Answer:
B. The first paragraph discusses the idea that Americans are united as one despite their differences. The second paragraph discusses the idea that acts of intolerance make it difficult to believe that Americans are united as one.
This question refers to the article "Do Juvenile Killers Deserve Life Behind Bars?" by Nina Totenberg.
In this article, Totenberg discusses whether life in prison is too harsh a punishment for juvenile killers. The author does not take a position on this matter, and instead focuses on presenting arguments that describe both sides of the question. The main purpose of the author is to encourage readers to think about the subject because legislation needs to be passed soon, and this is a difficult question that deserves consideration. She shows how important this matter is when she says:
<em>"Two years ago, the court used the same rationale when it struck down the penalty of life without parole for nonhomicide crimes committed by juveniles. But in Tuesday's cases, the court faces the question of life without parole in homicide cases... the big question before the Supreme Court on Tuesday is whether life without the possibility of parole is itself an unconstitutionally cruel and unusual punishment when it is applied to juveniles."</em>
