1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
pishuonlain [190]
4 years ago
7

Is it true that criminal laws deals with people who have been accused of acts that harm society

History
1 answer:
worty [1.4K]4 years ago
7 0
Generally, I would say yes to this question.

We may want to nuance the thought a bit, however.  Criminal law defines what acts constitute crimes, and those who commit crimes are prosecuted and punished under criminal law.  Do all crimes hurt society?  In a sense, yes.  But even a crime that has just one victim and isn't much noticed in the wider spectrum of society still is a crime subject to arrest and prosecution under criminal law.

You might be interested in
Which statements best explains what happened to Chinese workers during the Great Leap Forward?
RoseWind [281]
The Great Leap Forward led to a huge famine that killed off the majority of China's population
5 0
3 years ago
Qual era a casa da burgesia no seculo XIII
DerKrebs [107]

Answer:well for on you spelled burguesia wrong but what ever and Burguesia é um termo com vários significados históricos, sociais e culturais. A palavra se ... A partir de fins do século XVIII o conceito de burguesia foi redefinido por ... o alto clero, os principais meios produtivos e as casas bancárias, e passaram a adotar hábitos e investir em capitais simbólicos típicos da nobreza.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
(Documents 2-4) How did Anglo Americans react to the Vesey plot?
pashok25 [27]

Answer:

Explanation:

he was mad

6 0
3 years ago
What does this excerpt suggest about Ji-li's
jek_recluse [69]

Answer:

Her experiences later in life led her to view Mao’s policies in a negative light.

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Name and explain at least three reasons
Charra [1.4K]

By the 1770s, many colonists were angry because they did not have self-government. This meant that they could not govern themselves and make their own laws. They had to pay high taxes to the king. They felt that they were paying taxes to a government where they had no representation.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What sound signal alerts others that a boat is backing up?
    9·1 answer
  • How did the Mongol Empire affect Afro-Eurasia between 1200s and 1300s
    13·1 answer
  • Who might agree with john hay's opinion that the spanish american war was a splendid little war? who might disagree? why?
    7·1 answer
  • PLZ HURRY!!!
    7·1 answer
  • How long did world war II take to finish?
    5·2 answers
  • Which of the following is not a hill in jerusalem
    11·1 answer
  • 30 POINTS! HELP QUICK
    14·1 answer
  • How was the Dawes Act supportive of the retention of land by the Native Americans who settled on it?
    8·1 answer
  • What was on the war clothing of a crusader?
    9·2 answers
  • How did English policies lead to the writing of the Declaration of Independence? A. Colonists did not like sending their request
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!