The correct answer is B) Their location in the crossroads of the eastern Mediterranean was ideal for conducting trade with Asia, the Nile Valley, and the Middle East.
The factors that accounted for the Minoan’s preference for trade as the key source to economic success were their location in the crossroads of the eastern Mediterranean was ideal for conducting trade with Asia, the Nile Valley, and the Middle East.
The Minoan civilization lived on the island of Crete in ancient Greece. They based its success on trade. They had abundant natural resources and were capable of establishing traded agreements with faraway civilizations. The clime and fertile land of the region made Crete a great place for growing crops that fed their people and were exported to other nations. They had a fantastic location to do business with civilizations in Egypt, the Middle East or far Asia.
The best and most correct answer among the choices provided by your question is the second choice.
Their location in the crossroads of the eastern Mediterranean was ideal for conducting trade with Asia, is one of the <span>factors accounted for the Minoan’s preference for trade as the key source </span>to<span> economic success.</span>
I hope my answer has come to your help. Thank you for posting your question here in Brainly. We hope to answer more of your questions and inquiries soon. Have a nice day ahead!
The proprietors of south carolina recruited settlers from the West Indies. Explanation: The West Indies designated what today are the British Overseas Territories in the Caribbean: Anguilla, Bermuda, Cayman Islands, Turks and Caicos Islands, and Montserrat
I think that maybe people are saying different answers because there might have been many such laws. I will mention one example: the Diversity Visa Immigration: it means that people from Eastern Europe have a higher change of obtaining a visa due to a smaller population in the US than the western European Countries.
The statement about how Karl Marx and Adam Smith are different would be:
Adam Smith and Karl Marx are polar opposites in the political-economic, in such that Smith would in no way agree<span> with a revolution of the proletariat.
I hope my answer has come to your help. God bless and have a nice day ahead! </span>
