<span>The correct answers are: 1)D The statement refers to a situation in which the rights of other people are interfered by the guilty party, who cannot plead innocence through the right of "freedom of speech", as it is relatively "inferior"or of no importance considering the transgression of others' rights.
It is not an example of absolute, natural rights nor of civil rights (although it is about freedom of speech, which is a civil right), since its focus is about the peculiar situation, regarding relative rights.
2)B Civil liberties are a protective form of freedoms, or "liberties" which cannot be touched by the government, without due process.
3)B The Constitution initially didn't have a bill of rights and this became a controversial issue, focusing on the necessity to limit the governement's power.</span>
Answer:
I guess you could say it give a sense of suspense, you don't know what's going to happen.
Explanation:
The group that attempted to gain independence for India through violent means was the Sepoys. They were basically the Indian soldiers that were serving under the British or under European orders. The Sepoy Mutiny is very famous historical evidence regarding this matter.
Perseve what? You have no explanation or anything.
