Hmm, a strong argument typically includes a statement of one's own opinion, then your opponent's counterclaim, and reasons why the counterclaim is inaccurate or invalid. For instance, Tammy could have started off with a statement about how animal safety benefits the animals, and then address the counterclaim about it being expensive by stating it doesn't just help the animals, but the people as well. I think the answer here is false because Tammy's speech didn't include an argument about how expensive animal safety is. So false. I hope this helps, sorry it's so long.
Answer:
Nemur thinks that IQ shows a person how intelligent they are, but Dr. Strauss believed that an IQ test told a person how much intelligence you could get, not how much they currently possess.
<em>Plz mark Brainliest. Thanks.</em>
I think it is possibly A or C if eliminating answers helps you.
Read the excerpt from The Code Book. The difference between ordinary and digital mail can be illustrated by imagining that Alice wants to send out invitations to her birthday party, and that Eve, who has not been invited, wants to know the time and place of the party. If Alice uses the traditional method of posting letters, then it is very difficult for Eve to intercept one of the invitations. . . . In comparison, Eve's task is made considerably easier if Alice sends her invitations by e-mail.
How does the author support the claim that ordinary and digital mail are very different?
by citing statistics about both kinds of mail
by offering quotes from experts on the subject
by relating a personal experience of both kinds of mail
by sharing a hypothetical story as an example of the subject
Answer:
by sharing a hypothetical story as an example of the subject
Explanation:
According to the excerpt from The Code Book, the author talks about digital and ordinary mail and the advantages of each. He explains this by making a hypothetical scenario where Alice is sending out invitations via electronic mail and Eve who has not been invited wants to know the time and date, which would have been difficult if the invitation were sent through hand.
Therefore, the author supports the claim that ordinary and digital mail are very different by sharing a hypothetical story as an example of the subject.
