PUPPYLOVE91 AND WOLF HELP MEEEEEE WHO WAS THE FIRST TO THE WHITE HOUSE

History

1 answer:

Aleks [24]3 years ago

8 0

John Adams

Construction began when the first cornerstone was laid in October of 1792. Although President Washington oversaw the construction of the house, he never lived in it. It was not until 1800, when the White House was nearly completed, that its first residents, President John Adams and his wife Abigail, moved in.

You might be interested in

When reading a novel it is important to

Morgarella [4.7K]

Answer:

1 maintain the objective

Explanation:

hope this helps

7 0

3 years ago

_____ is the constitutional clause that delegates control of elections to the state governments.

dsp73

Time, place , and manner clause.

3 0

3 years ago

What was the set of complex interactions that connected african labor, american land and mineral resources, and european technol

butalik [34]

The Atlantic system was the set of complex interactions that connected African labor, American land, and mineral resources, and European technology and military power.

This is further explained below.

<h3>What is the Atlantic system?</h3>

Generally, The transatlantic slave trade was a component of the larger global slave trade that included the transportation of between 10 million and 12 million enslaved Africans over the Atlantic to the Americas during the years of the 16th and 19th centuries.

A network of people, raw resources, completed commodities, traders, and mariners that brought prosperity to colonial empires was tied together by the Atlantic Ocean throughout the time of colonialism.

This ocean functioned as a highway between European, Africa, and the Americas.

In conclusion, The assets that a nation-state is able to muster against all other countries for the purposes of military intimidation, defense, and conflict all contribute to the nation-overall state's military force potential.

Read more about the Atlantic system

brainly.com/question/5246990

#SPJ1

8 0

2 years ago

3. Is the minimum wage good or bad for the lowest-paid workers? Explain your reasoning.

svetoff [14.1K]

Answer: This is quite a complicated question and therefore requires quite a complicated and extensive answer. While it may seem like a minimum wage is good for the lowest-paid workers it isn't very good for an economy and workers as a whole. The reason for this being is that having a minimum wage and subsequently raising it (as is being done throughout the United States) boosts inflation meaning the price for products rises, (essentially negating all benefits that the workers received from a higher minimum wage.) Now while the lowest class workers don't really receive any benefit from this as their wage goes up but the products they produce also go up in price as well, but the average middle class consumer gets hit hard by this as their product prices raise but they still have the same wage. Another downside to having a minimum wage and having it consistently rising is that companies are forced to cut employees or not hire any more people all together. This is why jobless claims rise after wages rise. Companies cannot afford to pay workers a higher minimum wage and keep all their workers at the same time otherwise they would go in the red. This forces them to make cuts in staffing. Minimum wage would mandate that even if a potential worker and company agree on a price to pay for their work, the law would mandate that this would not be a possibility essentially making work harder to find. Minimum wage should not even really be needed as companies and workers should be able to find a good and fair price for work on their own without the governments help. If a worker doesn't like the wage they are receiving then they can quite and find a better paying job. This also boosts competition among businesses as they are all fighting for workers to fill their jobs and would also raise the wage, but in a natural process without all the detriments that artificially raising the minimum wage brings. Companies should be allowed to hire workers at whatever pay per hour they so what as long as it is agreed to as well by the worker. This means that more jobs are open to a more wide variety of people and that also means that if people want to work for less they can still be open to that opportunity as well.

6 0

3 years ago

Why did social inequality intensify in europe during the industrial revolution?

solmaris [256]

The social inequality in the English class system was stark.Wealthy and middle-class peoplethrived with all of the new opportunities created during the Industrial Revolution.Industrialproduction increased tremendously, bringing wealth and power to Great Britain and this class ofpeople.However, the poor really did not benefit much from the changes. There was noregulation of child labor.They worked long hours and were under paid.The working conditionswere horrible, and because unemployment was so high, the workers did not have a voice in<span>demanding better treatment

</span>

7 0

3 years ago