<span>Madison claimed that private rights and public good would be best protected in a single large republic rather than a mélange of small republics. Do I agree? Yes, absolutely, I agree. There's no strength in division; it is pretty obvious that in unity is strength. Just think for a seconds what will become of the United States if there are 52 countries in North America? India would be more developed had Pakistan and Bangladesh not broken off from India. Yes, public good should be protected in a large republic rather than a string of small republics.</span>
The AVESTA is considered the sacred texts and holy scriptures of Zoroastrianism.<span>
</span>
Answer:
His first law states that every object will remain at rest or in uniform motion in a straight line unless compelled to change its state by the action of an external force.
Answer:
The North wanted to cut off the flow of Southern commerce and invade the major Southern cities to force a surrender. The South wanted to prevent any early Northern success, and maintain its
defenses until public opinion in the North forced a negotiated end to the war.
After the fall of Fort Sumter, President Lincoln ordered a naval
blockade off the seceded states. The Union also wanted control over the Mississippi river and to capture Richmond, Virginia, the
capital of the confederacy. It is only about 100 miles (160 km) from Washington, DC.
The South planned a war of delay, to wear the enemy out
physically and mentally until they gave up their invasion of the South. Its limited resources made this problematic, and this
defense could not be maintained for very longer, especially since their means of resupply (European trade, and resources from the West) were under constant interdiction by Union forces.
Explanation:
America's economy was driven by the production and selling of cash crops during the 19th century. This was especially true for cotton. Cotton is a valuable commodity with several different uses. The development of cotton became easier thanks to the cotton gin. Due to the invention of the cotton gin, there was an increased demand for labor. This lead to the increase in the amount of slaves, especially in southern states. Essentially, the market economy and America's ability to make a huge profit off cotton resulted in an increased demand for slaves.
Many farmers desired that this institution continue to spread westward. This was due to the fact that many farmers were looking to settle west due to cheap land made available by the federal government through laws such as the Homestead Act. In order to have success on these farmers, slave owners wanted to bring their slaves with them to these new territories.
