1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
shtirl [24]
3 years ago
13

How did the act of supremacy of 1534 changed the religious patterns in england?

History
1 answer:
Anestetic [448]3 years ago
8 0

Answer: The Act of Supremacy is the name of two different acts passed by the English Parliament, both of which establish the English monarch as the head of the Church of England.

Explanation: The original act passed in 1534 at the request of Henry VIII, while the second act passed during the reign of Elizabeth I. The second act was necessary to reestablish the English monarch as head of the church, as Parliament had nullified the original one when she assumed the throne upon the death of Edward VI.

The original act essentially created the Church of England and severed church ties with Rome. With the passing of the Act of Supremacy, the Pope was no longer considered the leader of Christians in England. This act, however, was more of a political move than a religious one, even though it established Henry as “the only supreme head on earth of the Church of England.”

What was at stake was the succession of the monarchy. Although many of the common people and members of the English aristocracy were interested in the teachings of Martin Luther, Henry strongly opposed Luther’s “Ninety-five Theses” and wrote a book in 1521 denouncing Luther’s views that prompted Pope Clement VII to name Henry “The Defender of the Faith.”

Despite his lustful reputation, Henry VIII was a deeply religious man and believed that the wrath of God had descended upon him because of his inability to produce a living male heir with his wife, Catherine of Aragon. Catherine had been betrothed to Henry’s elder brother, Arthur, who died before the two lived together as husband and wife. Henry pointed to Old Testament passage (Leviticus 20:21) that prohibited men from marrying their brother’s widow, indicating God was punishing him for an illegal marriage.

Henry went through the religious procedures of his time by seeking an annulment from Pope Clement VII. The Pope kept stalling the proceedings, partially because Catherine, who was already in her early forties, was the aunt of the Holy Roman Emperor Charles V, whom the Pope did not want to offend. He had also fallen in love with Anne Boleyn, who was young enough to bear children.

In 1527, Henry asked for annulment for the first time and with each refusal, increased pressure on Rome. By 1529, he was thoroughly frustrated and cited the Bible verse from Leviticus and other Old Testament sources to support his cause. He also cited historical sources, including Anglo-Saxon documents that gave spiritual supremacy to the English monarch over the church.

The English church first recognized Henry as its head in 1531, but the king continued to try to reach a compromise with the Pope, all to no avail. In 1532, the English church agreed to surrender its independence as well as authority regarding canon law to the monarch.

This paved the way for the Statute in Restraint of Appeals in early 1533, which removed the ability of the English to appeal to Rome on matters of matrimony, tithes and oblations. By this time, Anne Boleyn was already pregnant with Henry’s child, so Thomas Cranmer, the newly appointed Archbishop of Canterbury, declared the marriage to Catherine invalid, allowing Henry to marry Anne.

You might be interested in
Segregation in the US armed forces was required by Jim Crow laws. Congress. the NAACP. Plessy v. Ferguson.
Dima020 [189]

Segregation in the United States Armed Forces was required by Jim Crow laws.

The Jim Crow laws were state and local laws in the United States, promulgated by the white state legislatures, that at the time were dominated by the Democrats after the Reconstruction period between 1876 and 1965. These laws advocated the racial segregation in all public facilities by de jure mandate under the slogan "separate but equal" and applied to African-Americans and other non-white ethnic groups in the states of the United States. In reality, this led to treatment and accommodation being generally inferior to those insured for American whites, systematizing a number of economic, educational and social disadvantages. The de jure segregation was applied mainly in the southern United States. On the other hand, in the north, segregation was generally de facto predominantly towards blacks who lived in urban ghettos.

Some examples of Jim Crow laws were segregation in public schools, public places, public transportation and the segregation of bathrooms and restaurants; In addition, there were also sources of drinking water for whites and blacks. The US military was also segregated. The Jim Crow laws were derived from the black codes (1800-1866), which had also limited the civil rights and civil liberties of African-Americans.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The Scopes Trial was about:
Brut [27]
In the Scopes "Monkey trial" in 1925, a substitute school teacher was accused
by the state of Tennessee of violating the state law that made it illegal to teach
human evolution in any state funded school.

Scopes wasn't even sure whether he had ever actually taught evolution, but he
said that he did, so that the case could come to trial and be heard.
4 0
2 years ago
What were two effects of the Louisiana Purchase on the United States? ​
sammy [17]

Answer:

What were two effects of the Louisiana Purchase on the United States? The purchase doubled the size of the United States, greatly strengthened the country materially and strategically, provided a powerful impetus to westward expansion, and confirmed the doctrine of implied powers of the federal Constitution.

5 0
2 years ago
Did king tut have powers
cestrela7 [59]

Answer:

<u>not superpowers, but he had powers</u>

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Was dunkirk a victory or defeat for the british army
GarryVolchara [31]

Answer:

Dunkirk was in essence a defeat, but there was a victory in the impact it had on the country's morale and national identity during the war.

3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which of the following is NOT one of the three basic economic questions?
    7·1 answer
  • Explain why most resistance efforts failed to stop European colonization. Use one specific example of a society/group that tried
    15·1 answer
  • Helppp meee please answer please answer them right toooooo
    6·1 answer
  • What does the story ñHoratius at the Bridgeî show about Roman values?
    13·1 answer
  • A spanish explore named _____ maped the cost of texas, and claimed the land for spain in 1519.
    10·1 answer
  • 5. As a result of the Great Depression
    7·1 answer
  • HELP PLEASE ILL GIVE BRAINLIEST!!! select the word from the list that best fits the definition Match each item with the correct
    5·1 answer
  • The role of the president has evolved over time because
    15·2 answers
  • Why was George W. Bush's election and first term historic?
    9·1 answer
  • Please help me!!! 50 points and brainliest!!
    9·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!