Answer:
This is really a personal opinion, since whether it is correct to send people to mars or not depends largely on your point of view and personal beliefs. Clearly, humans are far more capable than robots, and they can explore space and eventually other planets much better than a rover. On the other hand, sending people to Mars is not only extremely expensive, but it is also extremely dangerous for the astronauts themselves.
Imagine so many people died trying to get to space and then to the moon, and that was very easy compared to getting to Mars and back.
We can find millions of better ways to use the money than sending people to space, and that is really hard to argue against. Our planet, our country, state or even city could all benefit and use the money more productively.
But lets say that we do not care about the money because Mr. Bezos or some other billionaire decided to donate it. Now we would face the technical issues of going to Mars and actually staying there for a long time. A trip to mars is not something that would be carried out for just a couple of hours (like moon walking). Astronauts will have to stay in Mars for weeks, months or even years before they can return. This results in an extreme danger to their health due to cosmic rays. Can humans survive long term exposure to cosmic rays? The answer is NO and Mars's atmosphere doesn't help.
If we analyze this situation from a technical point of view, it would be better and safer to send astronauts to Titan (Saturn's moon), and would probably be also more useful. Titan's environment is similar to Earth's in many ways, and if we are actually doing it for a scientific purpose besides simply being curious, then it is much more useful to go to Titan. The scientific purpose of going to mars instead of other possible destinations is not very solid. Mars is really different to Earth and unless someone finds Martians living there, there is not much you can do.
Temperature, oxygen and food
Answer:
Country x
Population size 50,000,000
Full time students 4,200,000
Not employed & not searching 6,000,000
Not employed and searching 2,336,000
Employed 29,664,000
Labour force is defined as the population of the economy currently engaged in some employment and those jobless but available or searching for employment
Labour force is 32,000,000
Labor force participation rate is the labor force divided by the population size.
= 64%
Unemployment rate is defined as members of a country not employed and are searching or seeking employment.
= 4.7%
(Two arguments that support IT) - 1: people will still continuing to vote or trade other countries, 2: people will get good wages with their trades. (Two arguments that do not support IT) - 1: upon their trades, they will get high taxes, 2: some people trades that was stolen from the society. In my opinion the world and the USA are usually similar, in fact USA will eventually hated the IT because the Russians and its friends and at Middle East still continuing and make an agreement to other neighbor countries and the worst part they are still continuing trading weapons, or parts of the nuclear weapon.
In the elastic portion of the demand curve.
