Answer and Explanation:
In the given case, the second will would be destroyed non-intentionally by the testatrix that represent the person who writes the will. Also the second will would have be intended to revoke the first will
In addition to this, Testatrix intends the second will to be value also at the same time she dont want the first will to be probated
So the second will would be upheld because of testamentary motive.
Answer:
The solution is shown in the file attached below
Explanation:
Forgone output is the fundamental economic cost of unemployment. So, output (option (b)) is the right choice.
<h3>Forgone labour output </h3>
Forgone labour output is the amount of money that persons would have made over the course of their remaining working lives, discounted to the current year if they had not passed away too soon. Forgone labour production, like other accounting metrics like the Gross Domestic Product (GDP), is not meant to represent a gauge of society's prosperity. This brings us to the welfare-based approach, which is the second method for estimating the costs of premature death.
The potential for the production of goods and services is lost forever when the economy fails to provide enough jobs for everyone who is able and willing to work.
Learn more about Forgone labour output here:
brainly.com/question/16690539
#SPJ4
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "E": Perceptual defense.
Explanation:
In psychology, perceptual defense refers to the suppression of a stimulus that represents a threat or an uncomfortable situation for an individual. Those inputs are distorted somehow by the individual to reject the unpleasant feeling so that the person does not feel that bad because of it. In such a way, the brain works as a defense mechanism able to distort information to mitigate the effects in the behavior produced by the stimulus.
Answer:
A
Explanation:
nor sure but I think this is the right one