A common misconception in statistics is confusing correlation with causation. If two events are correlated, it merely means that they share the same behaviour over time, but it doesn't imply in any way that those event are related by a common cause, or even worse, that one implies the other.
You can find several (even humorous) counter examples online. For example, if you plot the number of reported pirates assault against the global temperature in the last years, you'll se that temperature is rising (unfortunately...) while pirates are almost disappearing.
One could observe this strong negative correlation and claim that hotter climate has solved the pirate issue. Of course this is a joke, but it explains why you shouldn't confuse correlation with causation.
Answer: induction
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
x=6
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
it mean
Step-by-step explanation:
asap skekdkdke
i am joking
Answer:
60° : 75° : 120° : 105°
Step-by-step explanation:
I like to work these by considering the relationship between a "ratio unit" and the angle it represents. Here, the sum of ratio units is 4+5+8+7 = 24. The sum of angles in a quadrilateral is 360°, so each ratio unit must stand for ...
360°/24 = 15°
Multiplying the ratio units by this value, we find the angles to be ...
(4 : 5 : 8 : 7) × 15° = 60° : 75° : 120° : 105°