The reason it is impractical is they traders had to go around South America... For example, say New York is sending trade ships to San Francisco. They would go all the way down to the bottom of South America and then all they way back up. By creating the panama canal, it allowed ships to cut through the land and make the route more practical.
1) <span>Argentina, Brazil, and Chile mediated between the two sides, and an effective agreement was reached.
2) Im actually not so sure on this one: Its main purpose was </span><span>providing the states with equal representation in the Senate and proportional representation by population in the House of Representatives which would be both a and b so unless you can do both then I think that its c because the 3/5 clause was later adapted
3) I think that it </span><span>would be the muckrakers
4) </span><span>It established a policy of equal economic trade for countries that dealt with China.
5) I think that its that </span><span>Political dominance was maintained in the North at the expense of the South based on the Three-Fifths Clause.
6) </span>He thought that President Taft had failed to continue his policies of progressive reform. The Bull Moose party was known for taking advanced positions on progressive<span> reforms
7) They did do it </span>to escape religious persecution, to seek a better way of life,to find their fortune. I'm not sure that they colonized the Americas just so they could <span>to increase taxes on colonists,to wage war with native tribes or to lose representation in Parliament but they could have,I don't think that its a main reason.
8) I'm pretty sure that its because </span>The amendments constitute the government’s recognition of naturally occurring rights and liberties. <span>People were afraid the new government did not protect the rights of individual people,so they created the Bill of Rights
9)I believe that its because t</span><span>he modern-day southwestern states were acquired before the modern-day midwestern states.
10)Textile workers had been already fighting for better workers rights before the fire, many of the people working in the factory themselves had fought for rights so i think that its that b</span><span>etter building safety codes and other worker protections were adopted, because that only happened after the fire and taught many other companies a lesson
Hope this helps! :)</span>
Answer:
The Second World War had devastating consequences for Europe. The human losses were extremely severe, and people were shocked to discover the atrocities perpetrated by the Nazi regime. The economies of several European countries were left in tatters: industrial and agricultural infrastructures had been destroyed, towns and cities had been razed to the ground by bombing raids, means of communication had been damaged and there were shortages of foodstuffs.
“Increase in company stock prices” is NOT likely to have a direct correlation with an increase in productivity in a company because when speaking about productivity it refers to improving the amount of products manufactured or sold by a company. For example, if a company that assembles cars today makes 1.000 cars per day and then increases that amount to 2.000 cars assembled per day, company productivity has improved 100%.
Company productivity may increase for the following reasons:
• Buying new technology: following the car company example, if it acquires new technology that speeds up the production process, such as an assembly machine, then more cars will be made.
• Additional training for their labor force: If the company that bought a new machine trains its labor force to use it, then production will also increase as employees know how to handle the equipment.
• Hiring additional workers: more qualified workers mean more production. For example, a company has 50 workers and they make 100 pair of shoes daily, then it hires 50 more workers so they make 200 pair of shoes by day. Therefore, the company productivity has increased.
