How did the system of sharecropping affect landowners and labors in the South

2 answers:

8 0

The system often trapped laborers in a cycle of debt and dependence while allowing landowners to profit from laborers’ hard work.

mezya [45]3 years ago

4 0

Answer:

Sharecropping farming was introduced in the South after the Civil War in America in the Reconstruction era. The South lost the war, the states were in complete ruin with destruction. The planters in the South, who own plantation were in debt with no slaves to work in the field. Sharecropping gave the poor farmers, both white and black, to earn a living by working in the fields of planters in the South. Which somewhat helped in gaining stability in the economy of the South.

You might be interested in

Which of these was a powerful political machine?

Dmitry_Shevchenko [17]

"c. Tammany Hall" is the best option from the list, since this was a place that people would meet not only to discuss important issues, but to nominate and elect representatives.

4 0

3 years ago

The outcome of the First Battle of Bull Run

Assoli18 [71]

Answer:

The end result of the battle was a Confederate victory and Federal forces retreated to the defenses of Washington, DC. One week later, General George McClellan was appointed head of the Army of the Potomac. The three maps cited below all use the name “Bull Run” to identify the battle.

Explanation:

Hope that helps

have a good day

can I have brain pls

6 0

3 years ago

What was Joseph Costello doing in october 1967

Anit [1.1K]

Answer: Joe Costello

Explanation:

Just eighteen years old in the fall of 1967, he was a grenadier for the Alpha platoon of the Black Lions.

7 0

3 years ago

Why does antigone go willingly into the cave where she will die?

Solnce55 [7]

c. she knows that the guards are watching her closely.

6 0

3 years ago

How was american expansionism overseas similar to previous continental expansion westward, and how was it different? was the tak

dimulka [17.4K]

On the continental expansion, Americans pushed Native Americans off their land making deals with them that favored the US more than the tribes. After that, Americans pushed their ideas to the areas being developed trying to make Native Americans abandon their own culture.

On the expansionism overseas the US returned the land to its original inhabitants, this happened in Cuba for example. This was the main difference between expansionism inside and outside the US.

The taking of Hawaii, Puerto Rico, and the Philippines was a violation of fundamental American ideals of self-government and democracy, this was actually the main argument of Anti-Imperialists. Once the US had claimed the territory they established their own rule and define role/impact in each respective country. Conquering other territories and forcing them to abide by American ideals and culture goes against the idea of American freedom.

7 0

3 years ago