It's most likely D, as Hitler was an anti-semite buttwad.
But it might be B. Hitler was very pro-working class.
Answer:
Signs were used to indicate where non-whites could legally walk, talk, drink, rest, or eat. The U.S. Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of segregation in Plessy v. Ferguson (1897), so long as "separate but equal" facilities were provided, a requirement that was rarely met in practice.
Explanation:
The doctrine was overturned in Brown v. Board of Education (1954) unanimously by the Supreme Court under Chief Justice Earl Warren, and in the following years the Warren Court further ruled against racial segregation in several landmark cases including Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. United States (1964), which helped bring an end to the Jim Crow laws.
The Edict of Nantes <span>granted the Calvinist Protestants of France substantial rights in the nation, which was still
considered essentially Catholic at the time.</span>
Answer:
Medicare
Explanation:
Medicare is the United States National Health Insurance Program for people 65 years of age or older. Some people under the age of 65, such as people with disabilities, people with permanent renal failure, or amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (Charcot's disease), can also participate in the Medicare program. The program helps pay for medical care, but it does not cover all medical expenses and not all expenses for long-term care. The Medicare program is funded by a portion of the payroll tax levied on both employees and employers. It is also partially funded by monthly contributions deducted from Social Security benefits.
Medicare was created with the aim of working with citizens of retirement age who want to solve health problems. The program exists entirely on funds deducted from corporate income tax, progressive income tax and payroll tax. Due to its existence, hospital systems everywhere receive part of their income; up to about half of the budget of these institutions are revenues from the Medicare program.
Medicare has a slightly different line of services, due to the fact that the program serves older Americans and solves their health problems. So, most often, the program is used in order to receive some preventive services, undergo inpatient treatment, or to be able to call a doctor at home for some kind of therapeutic procedures.
The supreme court justices ruled that the government could not restrict independent expenditures by corporations or unions to political campaigns in <span>Buckley v. Valeo</span>. Buckley v. Valeo was very complicated case which lead the Court at two conclusions:
1) Restrictions on individual contributions to political campaigns did not violate the First Amendment;
2) Restriction of independent expenditures in campaigns did violate the First Amendment.
