The Harlem Renaissance was the rebirth of black art in the community of African-Americans living in Harlem, New York during the 1920s.
The Renaissance of Harlem was integrated by a varied cultural revolution that integrated Jazz music, literature and painting, forming the main components of this artistic movement. At the beginning of the 1920s three key works showed the new African-American literary creativity. Harlem Shadows (1922) by Claude McKay, became one of the first African-American works published by a major national publishing house. Cane (1923), by Jean Toomer, is an experimental novel that combines poetry and prose to show southern and urban rural life in the North American Negroes. Finally, Confusion (1924), the first novel by Jessie Fauset, represents the life of the African-American middle class from the point of view of a woman.
Regarding music, The Apollo Theater emerged, one of the most famous popular music clubs in the United States. He is mentioned in Lou Reed's song "Take a Walk on the Wild Side". It is where many artists of this movement found a place to capture their talent.
The Virginia Plan was opposed to the New Jersey Plan, which called for one vote per state regardless of the population, since the smaller states were concerned that they would not be equal if the representation of the legislative branch was based on the population.
The correct answers are "It grew out of work of a statesman named Solon".
Solon wanted to promote a system that pushed equality and active participation from all citizens in government. He gave Athenians the right of serving in assembly gatherings. These changes represented a significant cange of paradigm to a certain extent towards democracy in Greece.
Every citizen of Athens who owned some kind of property was able to participate in the assembly. <u>Even though you were poor, you could still own a house and be able to serve politically</u>,
<u>Athenians who were in a situation of debt, were restrained from voting but they weren't enslaved.</u> The only slaves they had at the time were foreign.
All males who owned property <u>were free to serve but not obligated</u>.
You could say Greek democracy set things up for an improvement towards political equality, but still continues to be seen as a sort of "collective tyranny".<u> Political decisions were made by majority vote, and this often led to the poor overpassing common welfare, rendering the system a false democracy. </u><u>So even though Greek democracy did push many advances, it also had plenty of crucial flaws it couldn't overcome</u>.
Hope this helps!
Answer:
To many historians, the fall of the Western Roman Empire in the 5th century CE has always been viewed as the end of the ancient world and the onset of the Middle Ages, often improperly called the Dark Ages, despite Petrarch’s assertion. Since much of the west had already fallen by the middle of the 5th century CE, when a writer speaks of the fall of the empire, he or she generally refers to the fall of the city of Rome. Although historians generally agree on the year of the fall, 476 CE, they often disagree on its causes. English historian Edward Gibbon, who wrote in the late 18th century CE, points to the rise of Christianity and its effect on the Roman psyche while others believe the decline and fall were due, in part, to the influx of 'barbarians' from the north and west.
Whatever the cause, whether it was religion, external attack, or the internal decay of the city itself, the debate continues to the present day; however, one significant point must be established before a discussion of the roots of the fall can continue: the decline and fall were only in the west. The eastern half - that which would eventually be called the Byzantine Empire - would continue for several centuries, and, in many ways, it retained a unique Roman identity.
